Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755522›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2024

Variations in HIV Prevention Coverage in Subpopulations of Australian Gay and Bisexual Men, 2017-2021: Implications for Reducing Inequities in the Combination Prevention Era.

Martin Holt, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, James MacGibbon, Limin Mao, Anthony K J Smith, John Rule, Benjamin R Bavinton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Locating Power in a Cross-Sectoral Health Promotion Collaboration Addressing HIV and Hepatitis C.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin HoltCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. m.holt@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-8274
Curtis ChanThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-1011
Timothy R BroadyCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-1868
James MacGibbonCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1359-9572
Limin MaoCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-5789
Anthony K J SmithCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-9542
John RuleNational Association of People With HIV Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-7744
Benjamin R BavintonThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-8278

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2002625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using repeated behavioural surveillance data collected from gay and bisexual men (GBM) across Australia, we assessed trends in HIV prevention coverage (the level of 'safe sex' achieved in the population by the use of effective prevention methods, including condoms, pre-exposure prophylaxis [PrEP] and having an undetectable viral load). We stratified these trends by age, country of birth/recency of arrival, sexual identity, and the proportion of gay residents in the participant's suburb. Among 25,865 participants with casual male partners, HIV prevention coverage increased from 69.8% in 2017 to 75.2% in 2021, lower than the UNAIDS target of 95%. Higher levels of coverage were achieved among older GBM (≥ 45 years), non-recently-arrived migrants, and in suburbs with ≥ 10% gay residents. The lowest levels of prevention coverage (and highest levels of HIV risk) were recorded among younger GBM (< 25 years) and bisexual and other-identified participants. Younger, recently-arrived, and bisexual GBM were the most likely to use condoms, while PrEP use was concentrated among gay men, 25-44-year-olds, and in suburbs with more gay residents. The use of undetectable viral load was most common among participants aged ≥ 45 years. Our analysis shows that high HIV prevention coverage can be achieved through a mixture of condom use, PrEP use, and undetectable viral load, or by emphasising PrEP use. In the Australian context, younger, bisexual and other-identified GBM should be prioritised for enhanced access to effective HIV prevention methods. We encourage other jurisdictions to assess the level of coverage achieved by combination prevention, and variations in uptake.

Indexed as

BisexualityCondomsHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAdultAustraliaHumansMaleMiddle AgedSafe SexSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersViral LoadAustraliaBehavioural surveillanceCombination preventionGay and bisexual menHIV prevention coverageMen who have sex with men

Identifiers

PMID37755522
PMCPMC11069488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.