Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755519›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients across the USA.

Lukas Scheipner, Stefano Tappero, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Francesco Barletta, Cristina Cano Garcia, Reha-Baris Incesu, Simone Morra, Andrea Baudo, Zhe Tian, Fred Saad and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Lukas ScheipnerCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada. l.scheipner@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2036-8438
Stefano TapperoCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Mattia Luca PiccinelliCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Francesco BarlettaCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Cristina Cano GarciaCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Reha-Baris IncesuCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Simone MorraCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Andrea BaudoCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Zhe TianCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Fred SaadCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Carlo TerroneDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Ottavio De CobelliDepartment of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiUnit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Felix K H ChunDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Derya TilkiMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nicola LongoMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Luca CarmignaniDepartment of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Martin PichlerDepartment of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Georg HuttererDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerpl. 1, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Sascha AhyaiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerpl. 1, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAMedical University of Graz · ATGoethe University Frankfurt · DEOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Milan · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAl-Ahliyya Amman University · JOIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITKoç University · TRUniversity of Augsburg · DEUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo test for regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) patients across the USA.

methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2018) was used to tabulate patient (age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity), tumor (N stage, sites of metastasis) and treatment characteristics (proportions of nephrectomy and systemic therapy), according to 12 SEER registries. Multinomial regression models, as well as multivariable Cox regression models, tested the overall mortality (OM) adjusting for those patient, tumor and treatment characteristics.

resultsIn 9882 ccmRCC patients, registry-specific patient counts ranged from 4025 (41%) to 189 (2%). Differences across registries existed for sex (24-36% female), race/ethnicity (1-75% non-Caucasian), N stage (N1 25-35%, NX 3-13%), proportions of nephrectomy (44-63%) and systemic therapy (41-56%). Significant inter-registry differences remained after adjustment for proportions of nephrectomy (46-63%) and systemic therapy (35-56%). Unadjusted 5-year OM ranged from 73 to 85%. In multivariable analyses, three registries exhibited significantly higher OM (SEER registry 5: hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, p = 0.0001; SEER registry 7:HR 1.15, p = 0.008M SEER registry 10: HR 1.15, p = 0.04), relative to the largest reference registry (n = 4025).

conclusionImportant regional differences including patient, tumor and treatment characteristics exist, when ccmRCC patients included in the SEER database are studied. Even after adjustment for these characteristics, important OM differences persisted, which may require more detailed analyses to further investigate these unexpected differences.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleNephrectomyProportional Hazards ModelsSEER ProgramClear cellMetastatic RCCOutcomePopulationRegionalSEER

Identifiers

PMID37755519
PMCPMC10632241
OpenAlexW4387078230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.