Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755341›Full record

SynthesisUnited European gastroenterology journal2023

Clinical usefulness of scoring systems to predict severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis with pre and post-test probability assessment.

Gabriele Capurso, Ruggero Ponz de Leon Pisani, Gaetano Lauri, Livia Archibugi, Peter Hegyi, Georgios I Papachristou, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Patrick Maisonneuve, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Enrique de-Madaria

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in United European gastroenterology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06508502 (Pancreatitis - Microbiome as Predictor of Severity II), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06508502 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pancreatitis - Microbiome as Predictor of Severity II

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GoettingenRan2024 to 2027Enrolled700ConditionsAcute Pancreatitis, Acute Pancreatitis With Infected Necrosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Gabriele CapursoPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0019-8753
Ruggero Ponz de Leon PisaniPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Gaetano LauriPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Livia ArchibugiPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-9553
Peter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Georgios I PapachristouDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sanjay PandanaboyanaDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Patrick MaisonneuveDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Giorgio ArcidiaconoPancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6692-7720
Enrique de-MadariaGastroenterology Department, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-9541
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITFreeman Hospital · GBSemmelweis University · HUThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScoring systems for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) prediction should be used in conjunction with pre-test probability to establish post-test probability of SAP, but data of this kind are lacking.

objectiveTo investigate the predictive value of commonly employed scoring systems and their usefulness in modifying the pre-test probability of SAP.

methodsFollowing PRISMA statement and MOOSE checklists after PROSPERO registration, PubMed was searched from inception until September 2022. Retrospective, prospective, cross-sectional studies or clinical trials on patients with acute pancreatitis defined as Revised Atlanta Criteria, reporting rate of SAP and using at least one score among Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Examination (APACHE)-II, RANSON, and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) with their sensitivity and specificity were included. Random effects model meta-analyses were performed. Pre-test probability and likelihood ratio (LR) were combined to estimate post-test probability on Fagan nomograms. Pooled severity rate was used as pre-test probability of SAP and pooled sensitivity and specificity to calculate LR and generate post-test probability. A priori hypotheses for heterogeneity were developed and sensitivity analyses planned.

results43 studies yielding 14,116 acute pancreatitis patients were included: 42 with BISAP, 30 with APACHE-II, 27 with Ranson, 8 with SIRS. Pooled pre-test probability of SAP ranged 16.6%-25.3%. The post-test probability of SAP with positive/negative score was 47%/6% for BISAP, 43%/5% for APACHE-II, 48%/5% for Ranson, 40%/12% for SIRS. In 18 studies comparing BISAP, APACHE-II, and Ranson in 6740 patients with pooled pre-test probability of SAP of 18.7%, post-test probability when scores were positive was 48% for BISAP, 46% for APACHE-II, 50% for Ranson. When scores were negative, post-test probability dropped to 7% for BISAP, 6% for Ranson, 5% for APACHE-II. Quality, design, and country of origin of the studies did not explain the observed high heterogeneity.

conclusionsThe most commonly used scoring systems to predict SAP perform poorly and do not aid in decision-making.

Indexed as

PancreatitisAcute DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProbabilityPrognosisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSystemic Inflammatory Response Syndromeacute pancreatitisAPACHE-IIBISAPmeta-analysispredictionRANSONRevised Atlanta Criteriascoring systemsevereSIRS

Identifiers

PMID37755341
PMCPMC10637128
OpenAlexW4387077760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.