Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755303›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2023

Liver and Muscle Transcriptomes Differ in Mid-Lactation Cows Divergent in Feed Efficiency in the Presence or Absence of Supplemental Rumen-Protected Choline.

Malia J Caputo, Wenli Li, Sophia J Kendall, Anna Larsen, Kent A Weigel, Heather M White

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malia J CaputoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5766-628X
Wenli LiUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Station, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Sophia J KendallDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8259-4866
Anna LarsenDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Kent A WeigelDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2391-6260
Heather M WhiteDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-2811
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

Balchem N/ACouncil on Dairy Cattle Breeding N/AFoundation for Food and Agriculture Research RC109491Louis and Elsa Thomsen Wisconsin Distinguished Graduate Fellowship N/ANational Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67015-36650Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving dairy cow feed efficiency is critical to the sustainability and profitability of dairy production, yet the underlying mechanisms that contribute to individual cow variation in feed efficiency are not fully understood. The objectives of this study were to (1) identify genes and associated pathways that are altered in cows with high- or low-residual feed intake (RFI) using RNA sequencing, and (2) determine if rumen-protected choline supplementation during mid-lactation would influence performance or feed efficiency. Mid-lactation (134 ± 20 days in milk) multiparous Holstein cows were randomly assigned to either supplementation of 0 g/d supplementation (CTL;

Indexed as

fatty acidsmetabolismoxidative stressresidual feed intakeRNAseq

Identifiers

PMID37755303
PMCPMC10536747
OpenAlexW4386893765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.