Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755189›Full record

ArticleMembranes2023

Effect of Heat Treatment on Yellow Field Pea (

Nancy D Asen, Rotimi E Aluko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Yellow Field Pea Protein (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nancy D AsenDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1112-2954
Rotimi E AlukoDepartment of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9025-2513
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN 2018-06019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to determine the emulsification properties of protein aggregates obtained from heat pretreated yellow field pea protein concentrate (PPC). PPC dispersions were prepared in distilled water (adjusted to pH 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, or 9.0), heated in a water bath (100 °C) for 30 min, centrifuged and the supernatant passed first through a 30 kDa membrane and, then, the first retentate (>30 kDa) through a 50 kDa membrane. The 50 kDa membrane separation yielded a second retentate (>50 kDa proteins), which was isolated for emulsification studies. The near UV circular dichroic spectra of the protein samples showed more unfolded structures at pH 3.0 and 5.0 than at pH 7.0 and 9.0. The presence of small and spherical oil droplets of emulsions stabilized by the >50 kDa proteins at pH 3.0, 7.0, and 9.0 was confirmed by confocal laser scanning microscopy images. Emulsions stabilized at pH 7.0 and 9.0 had a narrower size distribution range than at pH 3.0 and 5.0. A narrow oil droplet size distribution range and lower interfacial protein concentrations of the emulsions stabilized by the >50 kDa proteins were observed at the corresponding pH of the heat treatment when compared to other pH values. Emulsions stabilized by the >50 kDa proteins exhibited a relatively low flocculation and coalescence index, which infers relative stability. The results from this work suggest that heat pretreatment of the PPC led to the formation of new protein aggregates, especially FT9 with enhanced emulsification properties, at some of the test conditions when compared to the unheated PPC.

Indexed as

emulsionsheatinterfacial activitymembrane ultrafiltrationpea proteinprotein aggregates

Identifiers

PMID37755189
PMCPMC10538139
OpenAlexW4386282818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.