Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37754966›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2023

Exploring the Influence of Cognitive and Ecological Dynamics Approaches on Countermovement Jumping Enhancement: A Comparative Training Study.

Felice Di Domenico, Tiziana D'Isanto, Giovanni Esposito, Sara Aliberti, Gaetano Raiola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felice Di DomenicoDepartment of Human, Philosophical and Education Sciences, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5897-9704
Tiziana D'IsantoDepartment of Human, Philosophical and Education Sciences, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7151-7486
Giovanni EspositoDepartment of Human, Philosophical and Education Sciences, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3659-8943
Sara AlibertiDepartment of Human, Philosophical and Education Sciences, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2470-4032
Gaetano RaiolaFaculty of Human, Educational and Sports Sciences, Pegaso University of Naples, 80143 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Countermovement jumping (CMJ) and free-arm countermovement jumping (CMJFA) express the explosive-elastic force of the lower limbs. Strategies to enhance performance in both types of jumping can be categorized into cognitive and ecological-dynamic approaches. However, the effectiveness of these approaches in improving CMJ and CMJFA remains incompletely understood. This study aims to investigate the impact of training protocols based on the two approaches to improving CMJ. Thirty-six subjects with an average age of 26 years were selected and divided into two groups: the ecological-dynamic group (EDG) and the cognitive group (CG). For 12 weeks, both groups followed separate protocols of three weekly one-hour sessions. EDG group followed a protocol focused on circle time. The CG group followed an instructor-led training protocol. Incoming and outgoing flight heights were measured. Pre and post-intervention differences within and between groups were assessed using t-tests for dependent and independent samples, respectively (

Indexed as

countermovement jumpexplosive-elastic strengthlearning approachessports training

Identifiers

PMID37754966
PMCPMC10532369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.