Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37754951›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

A Deep Learning-Based Model for Classifying Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebral Fractures on Radiographs: A Retrospective Model Development and Validation Study.

Yohei Ono, Nobuaki Suzuki, Ryosuke Sakano, Yasuka Kikuchi, Tasuku Kimura, Kenneth Sutherland, Tamotsu Kamishima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yohei OnoDepartment of Radiology, NTT East Medical Center Sapporo, South-1 West-15, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo 060-0061, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-4565-0918
Nobuaki SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, NTT East Medical Center Sapporo, South-1 West-15, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo 060-0061, Japan.ORCID 0009-0006-9435-4919
Ryosuke SakanoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita-14 Nishi-5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Yasuka KikuchiDepartment of Radiology, NTT East Medical Center Sapporo, South-1 West-15, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo 060-0061, Japan.
Tasuku KimuraDepartment of Radiology, NTT East Medical Center Sapporo, South-1 West-15, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo 060-0061, Japan.
Kenneth SutherlandGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hokkaido University, North-15 West-7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3494-5427
Tamotsu KamishimaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, North-12 West-5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7293-7471
Hokkaido University · JPNTT Medical Center · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis and initiation of treatment for fresh osteoporotic lumbar vertebral fractures (OLVF) are crucial. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is generally performed to differentiate between fresh and old OLVF. However, MRIs can be intolerable for patients with severe back pain. Furthermore, it is difficult to perform in an emergency. MRI should therefore only be performed in appropriately selected patients with a high suspicion of fresh fractures. As radiography is the first-choice imaging examination for the diagnosis of OLVF, improving screening accuracy with radiographs will optimize the decision of whether an MRI is necessary. This study aimed to develop a method to automatically classify lumbar vertebrae (LV) conditions such as normal, old, or fresh OLVF using deep learning methods with radiography. A total of 3481 LV images for training, validation, and testing and 662 LV images for external validation were collected. Visual evaluation by two radiologists determined the ground truth of LV diagnoses. Three convolutional neural networks were ensembled. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.89, 0.83, and 0.92 in the test and 0.84, 0.76, and 0.89 in the external validation, respectively. The results suggest that the proposed method can contribute to the accurate automatic classification of LV conditions on radiography.

Indexed as

automatic classificationcomputer-aided diagnosisconvolutional neural networksdeep learningosteoporotic vertebral fracturesradiography

Identifiers

PMID37754951
PMCPMC10532676
OpenAlexW4386830958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.