Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37754931›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2023

Clinical Validation Benchmark Dataset and Expert Performance Baseline for Colorectal Polyp Localization Methods.

Luisa F Sánchez-Peralta, Ben Glover, Cristina L Saratxaga, Juan Francisco Ortega-Morán, Scarlet Nazarian, Artzai Picón, J Blas Pagador, Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Luisa F Sánchez-PeraltaJesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, E-10071 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7630-353X
Ben GloverImperial College London, London SW7 2BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-0012
Cristina L SaratxagaTECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), E-48160 Derio, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1429-7936
Juan Francisco Ortega-MoránJesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, E-10071 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0287-5498
Scarlet NazarianImperial College London, London SW7 2BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-5253
Artzai PicónTECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), E-48160 Derio, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3316-6571
J Blas PagadorJesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, E-10071 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4382-5075
Francisco M Sánchez-MargalloJesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, E-10071 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-988X
Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón · ESImperial College London · GBAssociation of Electronic and Information Technologies · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

European Union's Horizon2020 research and innovation programme 732111MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 RED2022-134964-T
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading death causes worldwide, but, fortunately, early detection highly increases survival rates, with the adenoma detection rate being one surrogate marker for colonoscopy quality. Artificial intelligence and deep learning methods have been applied with great success to improve polyp detection and localization and, therefore, the adenoma detection rate. In this regard, a comparison with clinical experts is required to prove the added value of the systems. Nevertheless, there is no standardized comparison in a laboratory setting before their clinical validation. The ClinExpPICCOLO comprises 65 unedited endoscopic images that represent the clinical setting. They include white light imaging and narrow band imaging, with one third of the images containing a lesion but, differently to another public datasets, the lesion does not appear well-centered in the image. Together with the dataset, an expert clinical performance baseline has been established with the performance of 146 gastroenterologists, who were required to locate the lesions in the selected images. Results shows statistically significant differences between experience groups. Expert gastroenterologists' accuracy was 77.74, while sensitivity and specificity were 86.47 and 74.33, respectively. These values can be established as minimum values for a DL method before performing a clinical trial in the hospital setting.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical validationcolorectal cancerdeep learningpolyp detectionpolyp localizationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID37754931
PMCPMC10532435
OpenAlexW4386070260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.