ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2023
Comparative Biocompatibility and Odonto-/Osteogenesis Effects of Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Cements in Simulated Direct and Indirect Approaches for Regenerative Endodontic Treatments: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Coating on the Microhardness of MM-MTA After Exposure to Moisture and Human Blood.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway and Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Synergistic effects of collagen membrane and mineral trioxide aggregate on odontogenic differentiation and mineralization of human dental pulp stem cells: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Cytocompatibility of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Biomaterials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Iranian endodontic journal · 2026Review
- An In Vitro Tube Model for Cell Biocompatibility Study of Capping Materials for Regenerative Endodontics.Journal of endodontics · 2025Article
- Efficacy of root end cavity preparation techniques on gap formation of different mineral trioxide aggregate based root end filling materials: micro-computed tomography study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Impact of different capping materials extracts on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of cultured human dental pulp stem cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Physical, chemical and biological properties of MTA Angelus and novel AGM MTA: an in vitro analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Effects of Retro-Cavity Preconditioning with or Without Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid on Root Surface pH and Dislodgement Resistance of NeoMTA2 and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Flow Retro-Fills: An Ex Vivo Investigation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Synergistic Effect of Polyethylene Glycol and Lactic Acid on Handling Properties and Antibacterial Efficacy of Premixed Calcium Silicate Cement.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegenerative dentistry is the operation of restoring dental, oral and maxillofacial tissues. Currently, there are no guidelines for the ideal cement/material in regenerative endodontic treatments (RET). Hydraulic calcium silicate-based cements (hCSCs) are currently the material of choice for RET.
objectivesThis systematic review was conducted to gather all of the different direct and indirect approaches of using hCSCs in RET in vitro and in vivo, and to ascertain if there are any superiorities to indirect approaches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. The study question according to the PICO format was as follows: Comparison of the biological behavior (O) of stem cells (P) exposed to hCSCs through direct and indirect methods (I) with untreated stem cells (C). An electronic search was executed in Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed.
resultsA total of 78 studies were included. Studies were published between 2010 and 2022. Twenty-eight commercially available and eighteen modified hCSCs were used. Seven exposure methods (four direct and three indirect contacts) were assessed. ProRoot MTA and Biodentine were the most used hCSCs and had the most desirable results. hCSCs were either freshly mixed or set before application. Most studies allowed hCSCs to set in incubation for 24 h before application, which resulted in the most desirable biological outcomes. Freshly mixed hCSCs had the worst outcomes. Indirect methods had significantly better viability/proliferation and odonto-/osteogenesis outcomes.
conclusionBiodentine and ProRoot MTA used in indirect exposure methods result in desirable biological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.