Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37754559›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Evaluation of the effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) techniques on survival response in cell lines with a new radiobiological modeling.

Serra Kamer, Sunde Yilmaz Susluer, Tugce Balci Okcanoglu, Cagla Kayabasi, Besra Ozmen Yelken, Sinan Hoca, Emin Tavlayan, Nezahat Olacak, Yavuz Anacak, Murat Olukman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serra KamerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Sunde Yilmaz SusluerDepartment of Medical Biology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0535-150X
Tugce Balci OkcanogluDepartment of Medical Biology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Cagla KayabasiDepartment of Medical Biology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6797-7655
Besra Ozmen YelkenDepartment of Medical Biology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Sinan HocaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Emin TavlayanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Nezahat OlacakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Yavuz AnacakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Murat OlukmanDepartment of Pharmacology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Cumhur GunduzDepartment of Medical Biology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
Ege University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal radiobiological model, which assesses the biological effects of novel radiotherapy techniques that concurrently modify multiple physical factors, has not yet been defined. This study aimed to investigate the impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on cellular response in head and neck cancer and melanoma models.

methodsClonogenic analysis, DNA double-strand break analysis, apoptosis, and cell cycle analysis were performed on cancer stem cell models, cancer models, and normal tissue cell models to assess radiation sensitivity.

resultsThe segmented radiation approach used in IMRT applications enhanced radiosensitivity and cytotoxicity in the cancer models, while changes in dose rate had varying effects on cytotoxicity depending on the tumor cell type. VMAT increased cellular resistance, favoring treatment outcomes.

conclusionsThe biological processes were influenced differently by dose rate, IMRT, and VMAT depending on the tumor cell type. The selection of the most appropriate technique is crucial in representing new radiotherapy approaches. The obtained data can serve as a model to address clinical questions in daily practice. The integration of non-standard outcomes with standard applications should be considered in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedcell survivalIMRTradiotherapy techniquesVMAT

Identifiers

PMID37754559
PMCPMC10587949
OpenAlexW4387077455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.