Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37754552›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023

Investigating the cecal microbiota of broilers raised in extensive and intensive production systems.

Camila S Marcolla, Tingting Ju, Hannah L Lantz, Benjamin P Willing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prebiotics and probiotics in animal nutrition: implications for food safety, sustainability, and circular production systems.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of a defined bacterial community including and excludingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camila S Marcolla *Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-4841
Tingting Ju *Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Canada.
Hannah L LantzDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Canada.
Benjamin P WillingDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4285-4728
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

Alberta Agriculture and ForestryAlberta Innovates-Technology Futures (AITF)Canada Research Chairs (Chaires de recherche du Canada)Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceProduction practices in intensive farming systems significantly reduce the introduction and spread of pathogens; however, they may potentially minimize the exposure of animals to beneficial commensal microorganisms. In this study, we identified core bacteria from the cecal microbiota of broilers raised in extensive production systems that are missing or reduced in birds from intensive systems, including

Indexed as

broilercecal microbiotacommensalextensive production systemgut microbiotaintensive production systempoultry

Identifiers

PMID37754552
PMCPMC10581045
OpenAlexW4387078259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.