ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024
Comparative retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive treatments: A nationwide registry-based cohort study.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Proximal and Distal Ultrasound-Guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block Approaches in Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring the association between statins use or HMG-CoA reductase inhibition and migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness and acceptability of oral migraine preventives: A prospective, observational study.Headache · 2026Observational
- Treatment Persistence in Migraine Prophylaxis Comparing CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies vs. High-/Low-Evidence Conventional Oral Preventives-A Comparative Real-World Evidence Study of Depersonalized Data of the German Pain e-Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association of the total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with all-cause mortality risk in the migraine population.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Onabotulinumtoxin A for the Treatment of Post-Traumatic Headache: Is It Better than Anti-CGRP Antibodies?Toxins · 2024Review
- One-year prevalence of cluster headache, hemicrania continua, paroxysmal hemicrania and SUNCT in Norway: a population-based nationwide registry study.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
- Comparative retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive treatments: A nationwide registry-based cohort study.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeLittle is known about the comparative effects of migraine preventive drugs. We aimed to estimate treatment retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs in a nationwide registry-based cohort study in Norway between 2010 and 2020.
methodsWe assessed retention, defined as the number of uninterrupted treatment days, and effectiveness, defined as the reduction in filled triptan prescriptions during four 90-day periods after the first preventive prescription, compared to a 90-day baseline period. We compared retention and efficacy for different drugs against beta blockers. Comparative retention was estimated with hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for covariates, using Cox regression, and effectiveness as odds ratios (ORs) using logistic regression, with propensity-weighted adjustment for covariates.
resultsWe identified 104,072 migraine patients, 81,890 of whom were female (78.69%) and whose mean (standard deviation) age was 44.60 (15.61) years. Compared to beta blockers, botulinum toxin (HR 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.44) and calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway antibodies (CGRPabs; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.59-0.66) were the least likely to be discontinued, while clonidine (HR 2.95, 95% CI 2.88-3.02) and topiramate (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.31-1.37) were the most likely to be discontinued. Patients on simvastatin, CGRPabs, and amitriptyline were more likely to achieve a clinically significant reduction in triptan use during the first 90 days of treatment, with propensity score-adjusted ORs of 1.28 (95% CI 1.19-1.38), 1.23 (95% CI 0.79-1.90), and 1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.17), respectively.
conclusionsWe found a favorable effect of CGRPabs, amitriptyline, and simvastatin compared with beta blockers, while topiramate and clonidine were associated with poorer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.