Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37754544›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024

Comparative retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive treatments: A nationwide registry-based cohort study.

Marte H Bjørk, Solveig Borkenhagen, Francisco Oteiza, Aud N Dueland, Frank E Sørgaard, Erik Magnus Saether, Christoffer Bugge

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marte H BjørkDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5745-1094
Solveig BorkenhagenOslo Economics, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2562-2431
Francisco OteizaOslo Economics, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-9786
Aud N DuelandSandvika Nevrosenter, Sandvika, Norway.
Frank E SørgaardNovartis Norge AS, Oslo, Norway.
Erik Magnus SaetherOslo Economics, Oslo, Norway.
Christoffer BuggeOslo Economics, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0766-2870
657 Oslo · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NONovartis (Norway) · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Norges ForskningsrådNovartis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeLittle is known about the comparative effects of migraine preventive drugs. We aimed to estimate treatment retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs in a nationwide registry-based cohort study in Norway between 2010 and 2020.

methodsWe assessed retention, defined as the number of uninterrupted treatment days, and effectiveness, defined as the reduction in filled triptan prescriptions during four 90-day periods after the first preventive prescription, compared to a 90-day baseline period. We compared retention and efficacy for different drugs against beta blockers. Comparative retention was estimated with hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for covariates, using Cox regression, and effectiveness as odds ratios (ORs) using logistic regression, with propensity-weighted adjustment for covariates.

resultsWe identified 104,072 migraine patients, 81,890 of whom were female (78.69%) and whose mean (standard deviation) age was 44.60 (15.61) years. Compared to beta blockers, botulinum toxin (HR 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.44) and calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway antibodies (CGRPabs; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.59-0.66) were the least likely to be discontinued, while clonidine (HR 2.95, 95% CI 2.88-3.02) and topiramate (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.31-1.37) were the most likely to be discontinued. Patients on simvastatin, CGRPabs, and amitriptyline were more likely to achieve a clinically significant reduction in triptan use during the first 90 days of treatment, with propensity score-adjusted ORs of 1.28 (95% CI 1.19-1.38), 1.23 (95% CI 0.79-1.90), and 1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.17), respectively.

conclusionsWe found a favorable effect of CGRPabs, amitriptyline, and simvastatin compared with beta blockers, while topiramate and clonidine were associated with poorer outcomes.

Indexed as

ClonidineMigraine DisordersAdultAmitriptylineCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRegistriesSimvastatinTopiramateTryptaminesAmitriptylineClonidineSimvastatinTopiramateTryptaminesbotulinum toxinCGRP antibodiesheadacheprophylaxistriptan

Identifiers

PMID37754544
PMCPMC11235668
OpenAlexW4387077487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.