Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37754192›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Enhanced Hunger Games Search Optimization with Application to Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems.

Yaoyao Lin, Ali Asghar Heidari, Shuihua Wang, Huiling Chen, Yudong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yaoyao LinDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7217-047X
Ali Asghar HeidariDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6938-9948
Shuihua WangSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
Huiling ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-9693
Yudong ZhangSchool of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-1493

Funding

BBSRC RM32G0178B8Data Science Enhancement Fund P202RE237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hunger Games Search (HGS) is an innovative optimizer that operates without relying on gradients and utilizes a population-based approach. It draws inspiration from the collaborative foraging activities observed in social animals in their natural habitats. However, despite its notable strengths, HGS is subject to limitations, including inadequate diversity, premature convergence, and susceptibility to local optima. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces two adjusted strategies to enhance the original HGS algorithm. The first adaptive strategy combines the Logarithmic Spiral (LS) technique with Opposition-based Learning (OBL), resulting in the LS-OBL approach. This strategy plays a pivotal role in reducing the search space and maintaining population diversity within HGS, effectively augmenting the algorithm's exploration capabilities. The second adaptive strategy, the dynamic Rosenbrock Method (RM), contributes to HGS by adjusting the search direction and step size. This adjustment enables HGS to escape from suboptimal solutions and enhances its convergence accuracy. Combined, these two strategies form the improved algorithm proposed in this study, referred to as RLHGS. To assess the efficacy of the introduced strategies, specific experiments are designed to evaluate the impact of LS-OBL and RM on enhancing HGS performance. The experimental results unequivocally demonstrate that integrating these two strategies significantly enhances the capabilities of HGS. Furthermore, RLHGS is compared against eight state-of-the-art algorithms using 23 well-established benchmark functions and the CEC2020 test suite. The experimental results consistently indicate that RLHGS outperforms the other algorithms, securing the top rank in both test suites. This compelling evidence substantiates the superior functionality and performance of RLHGS compared to its counterparts. Moreover, RLHGS is applied to address four constrained real-world engineering optimization problems. The final results underscore the effectiveness of RLHGS in tackling such problems, further supporting its value as an efficient optimization method.

Indexed as

benchmarkengineering optimization problemsHunger Games Searchlogarithmic spiralRosenbrock Methodswarm intelligence

Identifiers

PMID37754192
PMCPMC10526405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.