Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37754153›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Training of Feed-Forward Neural Networks by Using Optimization Algorithms Based on Swarm-Intelligent for Maximum Power Point Tracking.

Ebubekir Kaya, Ceren Baştemur Kaya, Emre Bendeş, Sema Atasever, Başak Öztürk, Bilgin Yazlık

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ebubekir KayaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Engineering Architecture Faculty, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevşehir 50300, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8576-7750
Ceren Baştemur KayaDepartment of Computer Technologies, Nevsehir Vocational School, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevşehir 50300, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0091-3606
Emre BendeşDepartment of Computer Engineering, Engineering Architecture Faculty, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevşehir 50300, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9432-3278
Sema AtaseverDepartment of Computer Engineering, Engineering Architecture Faculty, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevşehir 50300, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2295-7917
Başak ÖztürkDepartment of Computer Engineering, Engineering Architecture Faculty, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevşehir 50300, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7295-2452
Bilgin YazlıkDepartment of Computer Engineering, Engineering Architecture Faculty, Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Nevşehir 50300, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8172-3192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most used artificial intelligence techniques for maximum power point tracking is artificial neural networks. In order to achieve successful results in maximum power point tracking, the training process of artificial neural networks is important. Metaheuristic algorithms are used extensively in the literature for neural network training. An important group of metaheuristic algorithms is swarm-intelligent-based optimization algorithms. In this study, feed-forward neural network training is carried out for maximum power point tracking by using 13 swarm-intelligent-based optimization algorithms. These algorithms are artificial bee colony, butterfly optimization, cuckoo search, chicken swarm optimization, dragonfly algorithm, firefly algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm, krill herd algorithm, particle swarm optimization, salp swarm algorithm, selfish herd optimizer, tunicate swarm algorithm, and tuna swarm optimization. Mean squared error is used as the error metric, and the performances of the algorithms in different network structures are evaluated. Considering the results, a success ranking score is obtained for each algorithm. The three most successful algorithms in both training and testing processes are the firefly algorithm, selfish herd optimizer, and grasshopper optimization algorithm, respectively. The training error values obtained with these algorithms are 4.5 × 10

Indexed as

feed-forward neural networkmaximum power point trackingmetaheuristic algorithmswarm intelligence

Identifiers

PMID37754153
PMCPMC10526777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.