Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753781›Full record

ArticleTranscultural psychiatry2025

Voice hearing as a social barometer: Benevolent persuasion, ancestral spirits, and politics in the voices of psychosis in Shanghai, China.

Emily Ng, Fazhan Chen, Xudong Zhao, Tanya Marie Luhrmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transcultural psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily NgDepartment of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6122-9640
Fazhan ChenClinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, Tongji University Dongfang Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xudong ZhaoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Tanya Marie LuhrmannDepartment of Anthropology, Stanford, Stanford, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9923-4234
Tongji University · CNCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparative study of voice hearing is in its early stages. This approach is important due to the observation that the content of voices differs across different settings, which suggests that voice hearing may respond to cultural invitation and, ultimately, to learning. Our interview-based study found that persons diagnosed with schizophrenia in China (Shanghai), compared to those diagnosed with schizophrenia in the United States, Ghana, and India, reported voices that were strikingly concerned with politics. Compared to participants in the United States in particular, voices seemed to be experienced more relationally: Shanghai participants reported voices notable for a sense of benevolent persuasion rather than harsh command, and knew the identities of their voices more so than in the United States. The voices were striking as well for their religious content, despite the previous prohibition of religion in China. Our findings further support the hypothesis that voice hearing seems to be shaped by context, and we observe that this shaping may affect not only conceptual content but the emotional valence of the experience.

Indexed as

HallucinationsPersuasive CommunicationPoliticsPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultChinaCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAsiaauditory hallucinationsChinaemotional valenceschizophreniavoice hearing

Identifiers

PMID37753781
PMCPMC12096416
OpenAlexW4387078183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.