Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753711›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2023

Denoising task-related fMRI: Balancing noise reduction against signal loss.

M E Hoeppli, M A Garenfeld, C K Mortensen, H Nahman-Averbuch, C D King, R C Coghill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M E HoeppliDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9872-7739
M A GarenfeldDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
C K MortensenDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
H Nahman-AverbuchDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
C D KingDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
R C CoghillDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Funding

SUPRASPINAL PROCESSING OF SENSORY ASPECTS OF PAINR01NS039426 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Robert C Coghill · 2001 to 2026
$7.9M
Brain Mechanisms Supporting Individual Differences in PainR01NS085391 · NINDS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI COGHILL, ROBERT C · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039426NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preprocessing fMRI data requires striking a fine balance between conserving signals of interest and removing noise. Typical steps of preprocessing include motion correction, slice timing correction, spatial smoothing, and high-pass filtering. However, these standard steps do not remove many sources of noise. Thus, noise-reduction techniques, for example, CompCor, FIX, and ICA-AROMA have been developed to further improve the ability to draw meaningful conclusions from the data. The ability of these techniques to minimize noise while conserving signals of interest has been tested almost exclusively in resting-state fMRI and, only rarely, in task-related fMRI. Application of noise-reduction techniques to task-related fMRI is particularly important given that such procedures have been shown to reduce false positive rates. Little remains known about the impact of these techniques on the retention of signal in tasks that may be associated with systemic physiological changes. In this paper, we compared two ICA-based, that is FIX and ICA-AROMA, two CompCor-based noise-reduction techniques, that is aCompCor, and tCompCor, and standard preprocessing using a large (n = 101) fMRI dataset including noxious heat and non-noxious auditory stimulation. Results show that preprocessing using FIX performs optimally for data obtained using noxious heat, conserving more signals than CompCor-based techniques and ICA-AROMA, while removing only slightly less noise. Similarly, for data obtained during non-noxious auditory stimulation, FIX noise-reduction technique before analysis with a covariate of interest outperforms the other techniques. These results indicate that FIX might be the most appropriate technique to achieve the balance between conserving signals of interest and removing noise during task-related fMRI.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingArtifactsBrainBrain MappingHumansMotionPrincipal Component Analysisnoise-reduction techniquespainsystemic physiological changestask-related fMRI

Identifiers

PMID37753711
PMCPMC10619396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.