Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753684›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2023

Comparison of brain functional response to mechanical prickling stimuli to the glabrous and hairy skin.

Qicai Wang, Yuan Tao, Tao Sun, Jie Yuan, Jiayu Ao, Xinghua Hong, Zimin Jin, Fangmeng Zeng, Yutian Lei

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Recent advances in artificial intelligent strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Review
  3. Skin ultrasonography and magnetic resonance; new clinical applications and instrumentation.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Review
  4. Comparison of brain functional response to mechanical prickling stimuli to the glabrous and hairy skin.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qicai WangCollege of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Interconnection of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Yuan TaoHigh Fashion Womenswear Institute, Hangzhou Vocational and Technical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Tao SunDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jie YuanClothing Engineering Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8632-9282
Jiayu AoCollege of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Interconnection of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Xinghua HongCollege of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Interconnection of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Zimin JinCollege of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Interconnection of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Fangmeng ZengCollege of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Interconnection of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Yutian LeiCollege of Education Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Fujian, China.
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University · CNHangzhou Vocational and Technical College · CNNanjing Medical University · CNQuanzhou Normal University · CN

Funding

Education and Scientific Research Foundation for Middle-aged and Young Scientist of Fujian Province JAS180331Research Foundation of Zhejiang Sci-tech University 21202299-YScientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department 113129A4F21075Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department 22200112-Fthe Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2020QF115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA kind of prickle sensation, which is a composite feeling of pain and itch, can be evoked by mechanical stimulation of fiber ends from fabric surface against to human hairy skin, rather than glabrous skin. Now, a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was conducted to investigate the cognitive differences in the brain for mechanical prickling stimuli to the two types of skin. MATERIALS AND

methodsA nylon filament with the diameter of 205 μm and the length of 8 mm was used to deliver mechanical prickling stimuli respectively to two skin sites, fingertip (glabrous skin) and volar forearm (hairy skin), of eight healthy male subjects. Simultaneously, the technology of fMRI was adopted to acquire BOLD (Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent) signals of brain functional response of the subjects.

resultsSomatosensory areas, emotional areas, and the posterior parietal cortex (especially the precuneus) are important brain regions that distinguish between the two conditions. The representation of mechanical prickling stimulation to glabrous skin in the brain favors much more the tactile information of the stimulation and contains no itch, while the key brain area, precuneus, involved in itch was activated by the same mechanical prickling stimulation to hairy skin, and brain response for the condition of hairy skin contains more emotional information, which plays an important role in pain processing.

conclusionTherefore, it can be inferred that a kind of stronger prickle sensation, which contains both pain and itch, was evoked by mechanical stimulation to hairy skin than glabrous skin.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhysical StimulationAdultBrain MappingHairHumansMalePainPruritusSkinSkin Physiological PhenomenaTouchYoung Adultbrain responsefunctional magnetic resonance imagingglabrous skinhairy skinitchmechanical pricklepain

Identifiers

PMID37753684
PMCPMC10460934
OpenAlexW4386221634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.