Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753507›Full record

ArticleJournal of hospice and palliative care2023

Participation and Influencing Factors in the Decision-Making of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Focus on Deceased Patients with Hematologic Neoplasms.

Jae Eun Jang, Jeong Moon Ryu, Min Hee Heo, Do Eun Kwon, Ji Yeon Seo, Dong Yeon Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hospice and palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jae Eun JangHematology Intensive Care Unit, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-9062
Jeong Moon RyuHematology Intensive Care Unit, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-4031
Min Hee HeoHematology Intensive Care Unit, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-1295
Do Eun KwonHematology Intensive Care Unit, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2099-0238
Ji Yeon SeoHematology Intensive Care Unit, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-4722
Dong Yeon KimNursing Innovation Unit, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-5792
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the involvement of patients who died from hematologic neoplasms in the decision-making process surrounding the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (LST). Methods: A total of 255 patients diagnosed with hematologic neoplasms who ultimately died following decisions related to LST during their end-of-life period at a university hospital were included in the study. Data were retrospectively obtained from electronic medical records and analyzed utilizing the chi-square test, independent t-test, and logistic regression. Results: In total, 42.0% of patients participated in the decision-making process regarding LST for their hematologic neoplasms, while 58.0% of decisions were made with family involvement. Among these patients, 65.1% died in general wards and 34.9% in intensive care units (ICUs) as a result of decisions such as the suspension of LST. The period from the LST decision to death was longer when the decision was made by the patient (average, 27.15 days) than when it was made by the family (average, 7.48 days). Most decisions were made by doctors and family members in the ICU, where only 20.6% of patients exercised their right to make decisions regarding LST, a rate considerably lower than 79.4% observed in general wards. Decisions to withhold or withdraw LST were more commonly made by patients themselves than by their families. Conclusion: The key to discussing the decision to suspend hospice care and LST is respecting the patient's self-determination. If a patient is lucid prior to admission to the ICU, considerations about suspending LST should involve the patient input.

Indexed as

Hematologic neoplasmsPalliative carePatient self-determination actResuscitation ordersTerminal care

Identifiers

PMID37753507
PMCPMC10519723
OpenAlexW4379471284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.