Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753443›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Effect of unguided e-cigarette provision on uptake, use, and smoking cessation among adults who smoke in the USA: a naturalistic, randomised, controlled clinical trial.

Matthew J Carpenter, Amy E Wahlquist, Jennifer Dahne, Kevin M Gray, K Michael Cummings, Graham Warren, Theodore L Wagener, Maciej L Goniewicz, Tracy T Smith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03453385 (Clinical Outcomes of a Nationwide, Naturalistic E-Cig Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03453385 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Outcomes of a Nationwide, Naturalistic E-Cig Trial (CONNECT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled638ConditionsSmoking, Tobacco UseArmsElectronic Cigarette
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Recommendations on interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in adults in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  4. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  5. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J CarpenterDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.
Amy E WahlquistCenter for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Jennifer DahneDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.
Kevin M GrayDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.
Graham WarrenHollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA.
Theodore L WagenerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH, USA.
Maciej L GoniewiczDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, USA.
Tracy T SmithDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USEast Tennessee State University · USMUSC Hollings Cancer Center · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

A Naturalistic Nationwide Randomized Study of e-Cigarette Uptake and ConsequencesR01CA210625 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CARPENTER, MATTHEW J · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA210625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As summarised in the most recent Cochrane review, the few clinical trials on e-cigarettes are largely focused on smoking cessation. We aimed to determine the naturalistic uptake, use, and impact of e-cigarettes among adults who may or may not want to stop smoking. Methods: In this naturalistic, randomised, controlled clinical trial, adult smokers, across the motivational spectrum and with minimal history of e-cigarette use, were recruited online from the general community within 11 cities across the USA. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to either receive either a free 4-week supply of flavoured, tank-style e-cigarette, or not. E-cigarette group participants received a battery and device with up to 30 pre-filled tanks, offered among five flavours, with minimal instructions on use. The study's primary purpose was to descriptively assess naturalistic uptake and usage of the e-cigarette, and to secondarily assess its impact on smoking behavior. The latter, assessed through six months of follow-up, included: a) self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence, b) incidence of quit attempts, and c) smoking reduction. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03453385. Findings: Between 5/2018 and 3/2022, 638 adult smokers were enrolled and randomly assigned (427 in the e-cigarette group and 211 in the no-product control group). Uptake of e-cigarettes was robust: approximately 70% of participants used the product, with average usage exceeding 4 days per week during the initial 30 days. Based on an intent-to-treat approach where missing data is imputed as smoking, almost all behavioral outcomes favored the e-cigarette group relative to no-product control, including point prevalence abstinence at six months (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.8; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.0-3.1), cumulative incidence of 24-hr quit attempts (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.0-2.2), and having reduced smoking by at least 50% since baseline (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.2-2.7). Results were similar under an alternative imputation. Interpretation: Complementing cessation-focused trials, results suggest that unguided e-cigarette use also leads to smoking cessation, allaying the notion that causal effects of e-cigarettes on cessation are not reflective of real-world scenario of self-determined use. For smokers who may not be able to quit using existing pharmacologic approaches, e-cigarettes may be considered to achive that purpose. Funding: National Cancer Institute.

Indexed as

E-cigarettesPublic healthRandomised clinical trialSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID37753443
PMCPMC10518503
OpenAlexW4385841124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.