ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023
Human amniotic membranes as an allogenic biological dressing for the treatment of burn wounds: Protocol for a randomized-controlled study.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies for Optimizing Acute Burn Wound Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Alginate-Based Hydrogels with Amniotic Membrane Stem Cells for Wound Dressing Application.Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Exploring the therapeutic potential of different sources of mesenchymal stem cells: a novel approach to combat burn wound infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Amniotic Fluid and Placental Membranes as Sources of Stem Cells: Progress and Challenges 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Burn wounds pose significant challenges in medical treatment due to their devastating nature and resource-intensive requirements. Temporary coverage of burn wounds using synthetic or biological dressings allows for reepithelization before definitive skin grafting. Allogenic skin grafts have been widely used but come with drawbacks such as rejection and disease transmission. The use of amniotic membranes (AMs) offers a promising alternative for temporary coverage, as they possess biological properties that promote faster healing and improved scar quality. The various components of the amniotic membrane, including pluripotent stem cells, extracellular matrix proteins, and regenerative factors, contribute to cell growth, migration, and differentiation, as well as preservation of the original epithelial phenotype. Objective: Reliable information on the treatment of burn wounds with AM is needed. The knowledge gained in this project may help to include this advantageous modern concept of biological dressings in clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to use human amniotic membranes from our in hospital laboratory, as an allogenic biological dressing after enzymatic debridement in superficial partial thickness, deep partial thickness or full thickness burn wounds. Methods: We will include 30 patients in a randomized-controlled trial with each patient receiving the study intervention and the control intervention. Two 7 × 7 cm burn wound areas will be compared regarding percentage of skin graft take, healing time, healing percentage value and total healing time. Human amniotic membranes will be compared to allogenic skin grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.