ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2023
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution and inverted triangular distribution in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of different types of internal fixation on the incidence of femoral head necrosis in adult femoral neck fractures: a single-arm rate and network meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution in comparison with the 'gold standard' of inverting three cannulated screws with triangular distribution, in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A total of 106 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated at the Department of Orthopedics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Provincial Hospital) from October 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into groups A and B. Group A consisted of 51 patients with a mean age of 73.3±6.8 years; and group B consisted of 55 patients with a mean age of 74.5±7.3 years. Group A was treated with closed reduction + inverted triangular distribution of three cannulated screws, while group B was treated with closed reduction + parallel distribution of three cannulated screws, and the general surgical conditions, including fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and functional recovery scale (FRS) score of hip joint function were assessed in both groups. All patients were followed up for an average of 14.8 months. Compared with group A, group B had significant advantages in operation time, number of times intraoperative fluoroscopy was performed, number of intraoperative guide wire adjustments, and proportion of postoperative referrals to the intensive care unit (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in fracture reduction quality, fracture healing, incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and FRS score of hip joint function between groups A and B (P>0.05). For elderly patients with femoral neck fractures, distributing three cannulated screws in parallel after closed reduction achieved similar clinical efficacy to 'gold standard' inverted triangular distribution, and had obvious advantages in operation time, with significantly reduced surgical difficulty. This procedure is therefore deemed worthy of promotion and clinical application in the primary hospitals of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.