Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753282›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2023

Burden of refractory and unexplained chronic cough on patients' lives: a cohort study.

Luis Puente-Maestu, Ignacio Dávila, Santiago Quirce, Astrid Crespo-Lessmann, Eva Martínez-Moragón, Javier Sola, María Luisa Nieto, Francisco Javier González-Barcala, Luis Cea-Calvo, Marta Sánchez-Jareño and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis Puente-MaestuServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, UCM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-0117
Ignacio DávilaServicio de Alergia, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas y del Diagnóstico, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Santiago QuirceServicio de Alergia, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-0921
Astrid Crespo-LessmannServicio de Neumología y Alergia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva Martínez-MoragónServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Javier SolaServicio de Alergia, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
María Luisa NietoServicio de Neumología, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
Francisco Javier González-BarcalaGrupo de Investigación Traslacional en Enfermedades de las Vías Aéreas (TRIAD); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS); Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; Departamento de Medicina Respiratoria, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-4784
Luis Cea-CalvoMedical Affairs, MSD, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Sánchez-JareñoMedical Affairs, MSD, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Rivas-PardinasMedical Affairs, MSD, Madrid, Spain.
Christian DomingoServicio de Neumología, Corporació Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Sabadell, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8358-773X
MSD (Spain) · ESHospital Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic cough (cough lasting for ≥8 weeks) can lead to significant impairment in quality of life (QoL). Using patient-reported outcomes, this cohort study assessed the perceived impact of chronic cough on QoL and everyday life in patients from outpatient hospital clinics with refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC). Methods: This was a multicentre, non-interventional survey study. Cough severity was assessed on a 0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Frequency, intensity and disruptiveness of cough were assessed using an adaptation of the Cough Severity Diary. The impact of cough on QoL was assessed using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). The physical impact of cough and associated impact on everyday life activities were explored using purpose-designed questions. Results: 191 patients responded to the survey; 121 (63.4%) had RCC and 149 were women (78.0%). Mean score on the cough severity VAS was 62.9 mm. Mean LCQ total score of 11.9 indicated reduced QoL. Cough impaired patients' everyday life, including the inability to speak fluently (58.0% of patients) and feeling tired/drained (46.6%). Women perceived poorer chronic cough-related QoL than men, as reflected by lower LCQ scores, and greater impairment of physical health, including cough-related stress urinary incontinence, and psychological health. Conclusions: Patients with RCC/UCC experience a significant burden in their everyday life, including impaired QoL, and perceive a negative impact on physical and psychological health and everyday activities, affecting work, relationships and leisure activities. The impact appears to be greater in women than men for several of the aspects studied.

Identifiers

PMID37753282
PMCPMC10518856
OpenAlexW4386524932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.