Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753248›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2023

Photographic Evaluation of Burn Depth via Telemedicine: Insights from Iranian Surgeons.

Hamed Shahdadi, Somayeh Rezayi, Fatemeh Shahrahmani, Ali Akbar Mohamadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hamed ShahdadiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Somayeh RezayiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University of Khorasgan, Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh ShahrahmaniDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5328-0585
Ali Akbar MohamadiDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The accurate assessment of burn depth is crucial for determining appropriate treatment. Telemedicine has emerged as a promising tool for supporting burn diagnosis and decision-making, as it allows for remote consultation with burn specialists and access to high-quality imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of telemedicine in diagnosing burn depth. Methods: A total of 15 Iranian surgeons participated in this study; they were presented with 13 images of partial thickness burn ulcers located on the extremities and trunk of patients. The participating surgeons were required to provide their diagnoses of burn type and depth, as well as the necessity of surgical intervention, and their responses were recorded. Results: Data from 11 participants and 143 responses were analyzed. The average diagnostic accuracy for superficial burns was 79.3%, while for deep burns, it was 13.72%. The mean total diagnostic accuracy was 75.2%. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that photographs can be a reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating superficial burns. However, photographs are neither valid nor reliable for assessing burn depth. These findings have important implications for the use of telemedicine in burn diagnosis and indicate that additional diagnostic tools may be necessary for accurate assessment of deep burns.

Indexed as

burnphotographsurgeonstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37753248
PMCPMC10518691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.