ArticleDermatology reports2023
Pediatric spitzoid lesions of the ear: a single-center experience and review of the literature.
Article in Dermatology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paediatric Spitzoid Neoplasms: 10-Year Retrospective Study Characterizing Histological, Clinical, Dermoscopic Presentation and FISH Test Results.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spitzoid lesions are challenging melanocytic lesions comprising benign, intermediate, and malignant lesions. In this study, we aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of clinical and dermatoscopical evaluations of pediatric spitzoid ear lesions. We collected and analyzed, clinically, dermatoscopically, and histologically, pediatric spitzoid ear lesions. We also conducted a systematic review of the literature. At the Pediatric Hospital Gaslini, excision and histopathological evaluation were performed on eight cases: 87.5% of the lesions were consistent with Spitz nevus (SN), and 12.5% with atypical Spitz tumor (AST). Notably, multiple (≥2) dermatoscopical irregularities were present in 5 of 7 SN (71%), yet none were found in AST (0%, 0/1) (Fisher's exact test, P=0.375). From systematic research in the literature, 9 patients were included in this review. At histology, 88.9% were SN and 11% AST. Remarkably, also in the literature, multiple dermatoscopical irregularities were present in most SN (75%, 6/8), but not in the identified AST (0%, 0/1) (P=0.3333). We present a monocentric study on pediatric spitzoid ear lesions. Importantly, dermatoscopical irregularities were not significantly associated with AST, neither in our series nor in the reviewed literature (respectively P=0.375 and P=0.3333), supporting the fact that relying only on the dermatoscopical aspect of spitzoid lesions is not accurate enough for the special site of the ear, where dermatoscopy could actually be misleading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.