Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753152›Full record

ArticleJCPP advances2023

Examining Children and adolescent mental health trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a year of the Co-SPACE study.

Carolina Guzman Holst, Lucy Bowes, Polly Waite, Simona Skripkauskaite, Adrienne Shum, Samantha Pearcey, Jasmine Raw, Praveetha Patalay, Cathy Creswell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCPP advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina Guzman HolstDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5023-1726
Lucy BowesDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-3875
Polly WaiteDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Simona SkripkauskaiteDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7501-4111
Adrienne ShumDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Samantha PearceyDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Jasmine RawSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences University of Reading Reading UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2739-6215
Praveetha PatalayCentre for Longitudinal Studies and MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing University College London London UK.
Cathy CreswellDepartment of Experimental Psychology University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-0956
University of Oxford · GBMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A major concern throughout the COVID-19 pandemic has been on young people's experiences with mental health. In this study we mapped children and adolescents' mental health trajectories over 13 months of the pandemic and examine whether family, peer, and individual-level factors were associated with trajectory membership. Methods: This study focuses on a sub-sample from the Co-SPACE study of 3322 children and adolescents (aged 4-16 years) for whom parents completed a survey at Time 0 and at least one follow-up survey between March 2020 and May 2021. We used growth mixture models to examine trajectories in emotional, conduct, and hyperactivity/inattention difficulties using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and multinomial logistic regression models to estimate factors associated with individual trajectory membership. Results: The average trend in young people's mental health appeared to follow changes in national guidelines regarding the pandemic. Distinct trends in GMM models highlighting individual differences showed that a 5-trajectory model best explained the changes in emotional problems whilst 4-trajectory models best explained variation in hyperactivity/inattention and conduct problems. While most young people followed low stable (62%-85%) or moderate stable (28%) symptom trajectories, 14%-31% experienced very high, high stable or increasing mental health difficulties. Young people following high stable trajectories were more likely to have special educational needs and/or neurodevelopmental disorders, parents reporting higher levels of distress and parent-child conflict, and were less likely to have at least one close friend. Conclusions: Most young people adapted well and experienced low stable symptoms, but nearly one third experienced high stable or increasing mental health difficulties. Young people with complex needs and parents with higher psychological distress were particularly vulnerable to high stable problems while those with positive peer relationships were less vulnerable. This study offers insight into potential factors that can be addressed using targeted interventions to improve the wellbeing of parents and young people in the event of future lockdowns and school closures.

Indexed as

adolescentschildrenmental healthpandemicwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37753152
PMCPMC10519733
OpenAlexW4327759346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.