Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37753006›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Machine Learning Application: A Bibliometric Analysis From a Half-Century of Research on Stroke.

Che Muhammad Nur Hidayat Che Nawi, Suhaily Mohd Hairon, Wan Nur Nafisah Wan Yahya, Wan Asyraf Wan Zaidi, Mohd Rohaizat Hassan, Kamarul Imran Musa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Che Muhammad Nur Hidayat Che NawiDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MYS.
Suhaily Mohd HaironDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MYS.
Wan Nur Nafisah Wan YahyaDepartment of Internal Medicine/ Neurology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Wan Asyraf Wan ZaidiDepartment of Internal Medicine/ Neurology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Mohd Rohaizat HassanDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Kamarul Imran MusaDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, MYS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quick advancement of digital technology through artificial intelligence has made it possible to deploy machine learning to predict stroke outcomes. Our aim is to examine the trend of machine learning applications in stroke-related research over the past 50 years. We used search terms stroke and machine learning to search for English versions of original and review articles and conference proceedings published over the past 50 years in Scopus and Web of Science databases. The Biblioshiny web application was utilized for the analysis. The trend of publication and prominent authors and journals were analyzed and identified. The collaborative network between countries was mapped, and a thematic map was used to monitor the authors' trending keywords. In total, 10,535 publications authored by 44,990 authors from 2,212 sources were retrieved. Two distinct clusters of collaborative network nodes were observed, with the United States serving as a connecting node. Three terms - deep learning, algorithms, and neural networks - are observed in the early stages of the emerging theme. Overall, international research collaborations, the establishment of global research initiatives, the development of computational science, and the availability of big data have facilitated the pervasive use of machine learning techniques in stroke research.

Indexed as

algorithmbibliometric analysesdeep learningmachine learningneural networksstrokestroke research

Identifiers

PMID37753006
PMCPMC10518640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.