Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752961›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2023

Contrasting genomic consequences of anthropogenic reintroduction and natural recolonization in high-arctic wild reindeer.

Hamish A Burnett, Vanessa C Bieker, Mathilde Le Moullec, Bart Peeters, Jørgen Rosvold, Åshild Ønvik Pedersen, Love Dalén, Leif Egil Loe, Henrik Jensen, Brage B Hansen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hamish A BurnettCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1868-4944
Vanessa C BiekerCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2061-9041
Mathilde Le MoullecCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-7091
Bart PeetersCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2341-1035
Jørgen RosvoldDepartment of Terrestrial Biodiversity Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9555-5217
Åshild Ønvik PedersenNorwegian Polar Institute Research Department Tromsø Norway.
Love DalénCentre for Palaeogenetics Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-7613
Leif Egil LoeFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences Aas Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4804-2253
Henrik JensenCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-1564
Brage B HansenCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8763-4361
Michael D MartinCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-5139
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NONorwegian Institute for Nature Research · NONorwegian Polar Institute · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic reintroduction can supplement natural recolonization in reestablishing a species' distribution and abundance. However, both reintroductions and recolonizations can give rise to founder effects that reduce genetic diversity and increase inbreeding, potentially causing the accumulation of genetic load and reduced fitness. Most current populations of the endemic high-arctic Svalbard reindeer (

Indexed as

conservation geneticsinbreedingrecolonizationreintroduction

Identifiers

PMID37752961
PMCPMC10519417
OpenAlexW4386114774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.