Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752960›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2023

Multifaceted framework for defining conservation units: An example from Atlantic salmon (

Sarah J Lehnert, Ian R Bradbury, Brendan F Wringe, Mallory Van Wyngaarden, Paul Bentzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Conservation Units for Anadromous Arctic Char (Evolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah J LehnertNorthwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre Fisheries and Oceans Canada St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-8299
Ian R BradburyNorthwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre Fisheries and Oceans Canada St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.
Brendan F WringeBedford Institute of Oceanography Fisheries and Oceans Canada Dartmouth Nova Scotia Canada.
Mallory Van WyngaardenBedford Institute of Oceanography Fisheries and Oceans Canada Dartmouth Nova Scotia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-2351
Paul BentzenBiology Department Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation units represent important components of intraspecific diversity that can aid in prioritizing and protecting at-risk populations, while also safeguarding unique diversity that can contribute to species resilience. In Canada, identification and assessments of conservation units is done by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). COSEWIC can recognize conservation units below the species level (termed "designatable units"; DUs) if the unit has attributes that make it both discrete and evolutionarily significant. There are various ways in which a DU can meet criteria of discreteness and significance, and increasing access to "big data" is providing unprecedented information that can directly inform both criteria. Specifically, the incorporation of genomic data for an increasing number of non-model species is informing more COSEWIC assessments; thus, a repeatable, robust framework is needed for integrating these data into DU characterization. Here, we develop a framework that uses a multifaceted, weight of evidence approach to incorporate multiple data types, including genetic and genomic data, to inform COSEWIC DUs. We apply this framework to delineate DUs of Atlantic salmon (

Indexed as

conservation unitsCOSEWICendangered speciesevolutionary significancegenetic discretenessgenomics

Identifiers

PMID37752960
PMCPMC10519414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.