ArticleiScience2023
Single cell
Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nonlinear optical properties of photosensory core modules of monomeric and dimeric bacterial phytochromes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Ramping dynamics in the frontal cortex unfold over multiple timescales during motor planning.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Analyzing the brain's dynamic response to targeted stimulation using generative modeling.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Disentangling the Neural Circuits of Arousal and Anxiety-Like Behavior.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- Ramping Dynamics in the Frontal Cortex Unfold Over Multiple Timescales During Motor Planning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Imaging and optogenetic modulation of vascular mural cells in the live brain.Nature protocols · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Optogenetic manipulation with single-cell resolution can be achieved by two-photon excitation. However, this frequently requires relatively high laser powers. Here, we developed a novel strategy that can improve the efficiency of current two-photon stimulation technologies by positioning fluorescent proteins or small fluorescent molecules with high two-photon cross-sections in the vicinity of opsins. This generates a highly localized source of endogenous single-photon illumination that can be tailored to match the optimal opsin absorbance. Through neuronal and vascular stimulation in the live mouse brain, we demonstrate the utility of this technique to achieve efficient opsin stimulation, without loss of cellular resolution. We also provide a theoretical framework for understanding the potential advantages and constrains of this methodology, with directions for future improvements. Altogether, this fluorescence transfer illumination method opens new possibilities for experiments difficult to implement in the live brain such as all-optical neural interrogation and control of regional cerebral blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.