ArticleCancer science2023
Evaluating the effect of childhood sunburn on the risk of cutaneous melanoma through Mendelian randomization.
Article in Cancer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipidomics in Melanoma: Insights into Disease Progression and Therapeutical Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Identification of potential causal-genes-relevant blood pressure: a mitochondria-related genome-wide Mendelian randomization study.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Prevalence of head and face actinic keratosis among older community residents aged ≥60 years in Shanghai: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Mendelian randomization study of genetic liability to cutaneous melanoma and sunburns.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The causal effects of childhood sunburn occasions on melanoma: A univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization study.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
- Evaluating the effect of childhood sunburn on the risk of cutaneous melanoma through Mendelian randomization.Cancer science · 2023Article
- Assessing Sun Protection Policies in Texas School Districts Located in Counties With the Lowest and Highest Melanoma Risk: Content Analysis and Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite numerous observational studies indicating an increased risk of cutaneous melanoma (CM) due to childhood sunburn, no studies have established a definitive cause-and-effect relationship. Therefore, our objective was to employ a Mendelian randomization (MR) design to explore a possible causal association between childhood sunburn and the risk of CM. To investigate the causal relationship between childhood sunburn and CM, we used large-scale genetic summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), including childhood sunburn (n = 346,955) and CM (n = 262,288), building upon previous observational studies. In the analysis, we mainly used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method of the random effects model, supplemented by the weighted median method and MR-Egger method. The results of the IVW method demonstrated that genetically predicted childhood sunburn was significantly associated with higher odds of CM, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.418 (95%CI, 1.426-4.099; p = .001). The weighted median method and MR-Egger regression also demonstrated directionally similar results (both p < .05). Furthermore, both the funnel plot and the MR-Egger intercepts showed the absence of directional pleiotropy between childhood sunburn and CM. Our study offers potential evidence linking genetically predicted childhood sunburn with CM, underscoring the need for individuals with a history of childhood sunburn to be extra vigilant regarding the occurrence of CM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.