ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2023
Excellent agreement of Norwegian trauma registry data compared to corresponding data in electronic patient records.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating performance and potential clinical benefit of the Swedish On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model for prehospital field triage on Norwegian trauma data.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Improving Trauma Data Quality in Rwanda: A Prospective Assessment of Registry Completeness and Accuracy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiological trends in abdominal trauma in Norway (2015-2023): a national register-based cohort study of severity, population-adjusted incidence, and short-term outcomes.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- The potential impact of changing the Norwegian trauma Registry inclusion criteria for patients not admitted with trauma team activation: Identifying patient groups to be excluded and considering potential risks.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- [Comparison of missing data handling methods for ACNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Risk of Suicide in Patients With Traumatic Injuries.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Pediatric moderate and severe traumatic brain injury - A national, population-based cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Observational
- The Norwegian national trauma registry: development process and essential data insights.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Is there a weekend effect in severe traumatic brain Injury? An observational, population-based study from the Norwegian Trauma registry.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Return to Work One Year after Moderate to Severe Traumatic Injury in a Working Age Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Risk of epilepsy after traumatic brain injury: a nationwide Norwegian matched cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Norwegian Trauma Registry (NTR) is designed to monitor and improve the quality and outcome of trauma care delivered by Norwegian trauma hospitals. Patient care is evaluated through specific quality indicators, which are constructed of variables reported to the registry by certified registrars. Having high-quality data recorded in the registry is essential for the validity, trust and use of data. This study aims to perform a data quality check of a subset of core data elements in the registry by assessing agreement between data in the NTR and corresponding data in electronic patient records (EPRs).
methodsWe validated 49 of the 118 variables registered in the NTR by comparing those with the corresponding ones in electronic patient records for 180 patients with a trauma diagnosis admitted in 2019 at eight public hospitals. Agreement was quantified by calculating observed agreement, Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's first agreement coefficient (AC
resultsAlmost perfect agreement (AC
conclusionAll tested variables in the Norwegian Trauma Registry displayed excellent agreement with the corresponding variables in electronic patient records. Variables in the registry that showed missing data need further examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.