Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752593›Full record

Trial reportTrials2023

A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective "less invasive surfactant administration" (pro.LISA).

Wolfgang Göpel, Tanja K Rausch, Barbara Mitschdörfer, Silke Mader, Egbert Herting, Inke R König, Guido Stichtenoth, pro.LISA study group

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rising rates of non-invasive ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Prophylactic surfactant therapy in the era of less invasive surfactant delivery.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wolfgang GöpelDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. wolfgang.goepel@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6486-4727
Tanja K RauschInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Barbara MitschdörferBundesverband "Das Frühgeborene Kind", Frankfurt, Germany.
Silke MaderEuropean Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI), Munich, Germany.
Egbert HertingDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Inke R KönigInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Guido StichtenothDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
pro.LISA study group
University of Lübeck · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEBundesverband Flachglas · DEUniversitäres Kinderwunschzentrum Lübeck · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KG2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory distress syndrome is the main cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. "Less invasive surfactant administration" (LISA), which describes intratracheal surfactant administration to spontaneously breathing infants via a small diameter tube, is recommended as the first-line treatment in preterm infants with more than 30% supplemental oxygen. Prophylactic use of LISA in preterm infants with less than 30% supplemental oxygen was not tested in randomised controlled trials yet, and long-term outcome data of the procedure are scarce.

methodsPreterm infants with a gestational age between 25 weeks + 0 days and 28 weeks + 6 days who are breathing spontaneously on continuous positive airway pressure with supplemental oxygen at or below 30% in the first hour of life will be randomised to a prophylactic LISA treatment with 100-200 mg surfactant intratracheally per kilogramme bodyweight (intervention group) or will continue the continuous positive airway pressure treatment (control group). Participants will have follow-up until age 5 years. At that time, the children will be tested by spirometry, and forced expiratory volume within 1-s z-scores will be compared between the intervention and control groups as the primary outcome parameter of the trial. Secondary endpoints include additional lung function parameters, endurance, motor development, intelligence, and sensitivity for infectious lung diseases. Short-term safety assessment will be done after completed enrolment (n = 698) and discharge of all infants. This safety assessment will include in-hospital mortality and short-term complications. DISCUSSION: Robust data concerning the possible long-term benefits of prophylactic LISA treatment are lacking. The current observational data from the German Neonatal Network indicate that approximately 50% of preterm infants with supplemental oxygen at or below 30% within the first hour of life are treated with LISA. The pro.LISA trial will provide short- and long-term outcomes of preterm infants receiving prophylactic treatment and will clarify if prophylactic treatment should be given to all preterm infants or if the current practice of selective treatment if supplemental oxygen exceeds 30% is more appropriate.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00028086. Prospectively registered on 8 February 2022.

Indexed as

Pulmonary SurfactantsSurface-Active AgentsAdultChildGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureOxygenOxygenPulmonary SurfactantsSurface-Active AgentsLISAPreterm infantSurfactant

Identifiers

PMID37752593
PMCPMC10523706
OpenAlexW4387048843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.