Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752502›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2023

Barriers and facilitators to seeking and accessing mental health support in primary care and the community among female migrants in Europe: a "feminisms" systematic review.

Patrick Nyikavaranda, Marija Pantelic, Christina J Jones, Priyamvada Paudyal, Alice Tunks, Carrie D Llewellyn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Ethnicity and involuntary hospitalisation: a study of intersectional effects.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick NyikavarandaDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Watson Building, Room 104, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PH, UK. P.Nyikavaranda@bsms.ac.uk.
Marija PantelicDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Watson Building, Room 104, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PH, UK.
Christina J JonesSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK.
Priyamvada PaudyalInstitute for Global Health and Wellbeing School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5GB, UK.
Alice TunksDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Watson Building, Room 104, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PH, UK.
Carrie D LlewellynDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Watson Building, Room 104, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 9PH, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-INF-1553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent years have seen record levels of migration to Europe. Female migrants are at heightened risk of developing mental health disorders, yet they face barriers to accessing mental health services in their host countries. This systematic review aims to summarise the barriers and facilitators to accessing mental health support for female migrants in Europe.

methodsThe review follows PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was pre-published on PROSPERO. Six electronic databases were searched: CINAHL, Global Health Database, Medline, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Thematic analysis was undertaken on the identified studies. A feminist quality appraisal tool was applied.

resultsEight qualitative, six quantitative and five mixed methods studies were identified. Barriers included a lack of information, stigma, religious and cultural practices and beliefs, and a lack of consideration of gender-specific needs within the health system. Gender-sensitive services, supportive general practitioners and religious leaders facilitated access.

conclusionsThe design of mental health research, services, policies, and commissioning of support for migrants must consider female migrant needs. Mental health support services must be culturally aware and gender sensitive. REGISTRATION: The review protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number CRD42021235571.

Indexed as

RefugeesTransients and MigrantsEuropeFemaleFeminismHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMental HealthPrimary Health CareAccessAsylum seekersFemale migrantsMental HealthPrimary careRefugees

Identifiers

PMID37752502
PMCPMC10523615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.