Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752481›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2023

Developing the better and effective nursing education for improving transcultural nursing skills cultural competence and cultural sensitivity assessment tool (BENEFITS-CCCSAT).

Ayla Yava, Betül Tosun, Katalin Papp, Valérie Tóthová, Eda Şahin, Emel Bahadir Yılmaz, Ezgi Dirgar, Věra Hellerová, Sandra Tricas-Sauras, Mirko Prosen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ayla YavaFaculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Betül TosunFaculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey. tosunbetul@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4505-5887
Katalin PappNursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, Hungary.
Valérie TóthováFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Eda ŞahinFaculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Emel Bahadir YılmazFaculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Ezgi DirgarGaziantep University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Věra HellerováFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Sandra Tricas-SaurasDepartment of Healthcare, Design and Technology, Erasmus Hogeschool Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Mirko ProsenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska, Polje 42, Izola, 6310, Slovenia.
Sabina LičenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska, Polje 42, Izola, 6310, Slovenia.
Igor KarnjusFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska, Polje 42, Izola, 6310, Slovenia.
M Dolors Bernabeu TamayoFaculty of Medicine, Nursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan M Leyva-MoralFaculty of Medicine, Nursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Erasmus+ 2019-1-TR01-KA203- 076879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA clear need for the development of new comprehensive, reliable, sensitive and valid measurement tools to adequately asses the cultural competence and cultural sensitivity of nursing students exists. This study aimed to develop a new measurement tool to assess the nursing students' cultural competence and sensitivity.

methodsThis cross-sectional, instrument development study's first phase included postgraduate nursing students (n = 60) for the piloting study, and the second one included undergraduate nursing students (n = 459) for the main survey. This study used two data collection forms: The Student Descriptive Information Form and the Better and Effective Nursing Education for Improving Transcultural Nursing Skills Cultural Competence and Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (BENEFITS-CCCSAT) draft. The content validity index was calculated using the Davis method. Cronbach's α coefficient and the item total correlation were calculated during the reliability analysis. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient test, Bartlett significance test, and explanatory factor analysis (EFA) were used to evaluate the validity of the assessment tool.

resultsScale validity and reliability analyses showed that the BENEFITS-CCCSAT included 26 items and five sub-dimensions: respect for cultural diversity; culturally sensitive communication; achieving cultural competence; challenges and barriers in providing culturally competent care; and perceived meaning of cultural care.

conclusionThe BENEFITS-CCCSAT appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the cultural sensitivity and cultural competence of nursing students. This can be of great use, especially before attending clinical areas, and can offer both students and faculty reliable information to promote reflective and critical thinking, especially in areas where improvement is needed.

Indexed as

Cultural competencyCultural sensitivityNursingStudentsTranscultural nursing

Identifiers

PMID37752481
PMCPMC10523685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.