Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752460›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Digital health literacy and digital engagement for people with severe mental ill health across the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in England.

P Spanakis, B Lorimer, E Newbronner, R Wadman, S Crosland, S Gilbody, G Johnston, L Walker, E Peckham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dietary E-Health Interventions for Adults With Severe Mental Illness: A Systematic Review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P SpanakisDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. panagiotis.spanakis@york.ac.uk.
B LorimerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
E NewbronnerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
R WadmanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
S CroslandDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
S GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
G JohnstonIndependent Peer Researcher, Clackmannan, UK.
L WalkerSchool of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
E PeckhamSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
University of York · GBBangor University · GBCity, University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V028529/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn unprecedented acceleration in digital mental health services happened during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, people with severe mental ill health (SMI) might be at risk of digital exclusion, partly because of a lack of digital skills, such as digital health literacy. The study seeks to examine how the use of the Internet has changed during the pandemic for people with SMI, and explore digital exclusion, symptomatic/health related barriers to internet engagement, and digital health literacy.

methodsOver the period from July 2020 to February 2022, n = 177 people with an SMI diagnosis (psychosis-spectrum disorder or bipolar affective disorder) in England completed three surveys providing sociodemographic information and answering questions regarding their health, use of the Internet, and digital health literacy.

results42.5% of participants reported experiences of digital exclusion. Cochrane-Q analysis showed that there was significantly more use of the Internet at the last two assessments (80.8%, and 82.2%) compared to that at the beginning of the pandemic (65.8%; ps < 0.001). Although 34.2% of participants reported that their digital skills had improved during the pandemic, 54.4% still rated their Internet knowledge as being fair or worse than fair. Concentration difficulties (62.6%) and depression (56.1%) were among the most frequently reported symptomatic barriers to use the Internet. The sample was found to have generally moderate levels of digital health literacy (M = 26.0, SD = 9.6). Multiple regression analysis showed that higher literacy was associated with having outstanding/good self-reported knowledge of the Internet (ES = 6.00; 95% CI: 3.18-8.82; p < .001), a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (compared to psychosis spectrum disorder - ES = 5.14; 95% CI: 2.47-7.81; p < .001), and being female (ES = 3.18; 95% CI: 0.59-5.76; p = .016).

conclusionsThese findings underline the need for training and support among people with SMI to increase digital skills, facilitate digital engagement, and reduce digital engagement, as well as offering non-digital engagement options to service users with SMI.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyEnglandFemaleHumansInternetMaleMental HealthPandemicsBipolar disorderDigital divideDigital Health LiteraryInternetSchizophreniaSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID37752460
PMCPMC10523616
OpenAlexW4387048005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.