Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752312›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Exploring the health information-seeking practices of breast cancer patients in a middle-income country with a diverse ethnic population: a cross-sectional investigation.

Kah-Chun Yip, Lee-Lee Lai, Shu- Ting Ngu, Reggina Syin-Tze Chong, Abqariyah Yahya, Mee-Hoong See

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Health information-seeking experience in people with head and neck neoplasms undergoing treatment: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kah-Chun YipFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1786-4991
Lee-Lee LaiDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. laill@ummc.edu.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-6340
Shu- Ting NguFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9494-2645
Reggina Syin-Tze ChongFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9149-2080
Abqariyah YahyaDepartment of Social Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9158-415X
Mee-Hoong SeeFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. meehoong@ummc.edu.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3966-3368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seeking health information is an important step for cancer patients to understand their condition and facilitate treatment. It also helps them deal with the unknown and aid in recovery. Therefore, it is vital to understand the factors that drive health information-seeking behavior. This study aims to achieve that objective in a localized context by surveying 421 breast cancer patients in an urban teaching hospital. The patients were presented with a 5-point questionnaire that explored their demography, health status, information-seeking behavior, and literacy level. The prevalence of health information-seeking initiatives reported was 60%. Patients with higher education (OR 3.31; 95% CI (1.39-7.87), p = 0.01), having their own business or were self-employed (OR 4.68; 95% CI (1.03-21.24), p = 0.046), and in a Medium 40 (M40) income level (OR 2.31; 95% CI (1.09-4.88), p = 0.03) and Top 20 (T20) level were more likely to seek health information. The mean e-Health Literacy Score (eHEALS) was 28.01 ± 5.0, with healthcare professionals having the highest level of trust (mean 4.22 ± 0.79) and most useful resource score (mean 4.21 ± 0.78). Even though Google was the most popular online search tool used by respondents, most of them seldom (23.77%) or had never (34.34%) discussed the online information they found with healthcare professionals. In conclusion, it is still best for patients to appraise the sought-after information with experts to avoid misinformation and treatment delay.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealth LiteracyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerHealth information-seeking behaviorMalaysiaPredictorsSources of online health information

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.