ArticleScientific reports2023
Applying feature selection and machine learning techniques to estimate the biomass higher heating value.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A sample model for applying feature selection and machine learning techniques to estimate and manage crayfish populations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Method for Predicting Alfalfa Biomass Based on Multimodal Data and Ensemble Learning Model.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Estimation of Several Wood Biomass Calorific Values from Their Proximate Analysis Based on Artificial Neural Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of heating values in municipal solid waste.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel neural-evolutionary framework for predicting weight on the bit in drilling operations.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biomass higher heating value (HHV) is an important thermal property that determines the amount of recoverable energy from agriculture byproducts. Precise laboratory measurement or accurate prediction of the HHV is essential for designing biomass conversion equipment. The current study combines feature selection scenarios and machine learning tools to establish a general model for estimating biomass HHV. Multiple linear regression and Pearson's correlation coefficients justified that volatile matter, nitrogen, and oxygen content of biomass samples have a slight effect on the HHV and it is better to ignore them during the HHV modeling. Then, the prediction performance of random forest, multilayer and cascade feedforward neural networks, group method of data handling, and least-squares support vector regressor are compared to determine the intelligent estimator with the highest accuracy toward biomass HHV prediction. The ranking test shows that the multilayer perceptron neural network better predicts the HHV of 532 biomass samples than the other intelligent models. This model presents the outstanding absolute average relative error of 2.75% and 3.12% and regression coefficients of 0.9500 and 0.9418 in the learning and testing stages. The model performance is also superior to a recurrent neural network which was recently developed in the literature using the same databank.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.