Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752169›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Lightweight image steganalysis with block-wise pruning.

Eungi Hong, KyungTae Lim, Tae-Woo Oh, Haneol Jang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eungi Hong *Department of Computer Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
KyungTae Lim *Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Woo OhThe Affiliated Institute of ETRI, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Haneol JangDepartment of Computer Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. hejang@hanbat.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image steganalysis is the task of detecting a secret message hidden in an image. Deep steganalysis using end-to-end deep learning has been successful in recent years, but previous studies focused on improving detection performance rather than designing a lightweight model for practical applications. This caused a deep steganalysis model to be heavy and computationally costly, making the model infeasible to deploy in real-world applications. To address this issue, we study an effective model design strategy for lightweight image steganalysis. Considering the domain-specific characteristics of steganalysis, we propose a simple yet effective block removal strategy that progressively removes a sequence of blocks from deep classification networks. This method involves the gradual removal of convolutional neural network blocks, starting from deeper ones. By doing so, the number of parameters and FLOPs are decreased without compromising the detection performance. Experimental results show that our removal strategy makes the EfficientNet-B0 variants 9.58 [Formula: see text] smaller and has 2.16 [Formula: see text] fewer FLOPs than the baseline while retaining detection accuracy of 90.73% and 82.40% that are on par with the baseline on BOSSBase and ALASKA#2 datasets, respectively. Backed by our in-depth analyses, the results indicate that only a few early layers are sufficient for effective image steganalysis.

Identifiers

PMID37752169
PMCPMC10522667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.