ArticleScientific reports2023
Meta-learning for transformer-based prediction of potent compounds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Few-Shot Prediction of Toxicity of Ionic Liquids Supported by Attentive Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Small data, big challenges: Machine- and deep-learning strategies for data-limited drug discovery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026Review
- A meta-learning framework to mitigate negative transfer in transfer learning applicable to drug design.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A meta-learning approach for selectivity prediction in asymmetric catalysis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Generative design of compounds with desired potency from target protein sequences using a multimodal biochemical language model.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For many machine learning applications in drug discovery, only limited amounts of training data are available. This typically applies to compound design and activity prediction and often restricts machine learning, especially deep learning. For low-data applications, specialized learning strategies can be considered to limit required training data. Among these is meta-learning that attempts to enable learning in low-data regimes by combining outputs of different models and utilizing meta-data from these predictions. However, in drug discovery settings, meta-learning is still in its infancy. In this study, we have explored meta-learning for the prediction of potent compounds via generative design using transformer models. For different activity classes, meta-learning models were derived to predict highly potent compounds from weakly potent templates in the presence of varying amounts of fine-tuning data and compared to other transformers developed for this task. Meta-learning consistently led to statistically significant improvements in model performance, in particular, when fine-tuning data were limited. Moreover, meta-learning models generated target compounds with higher potency and larger potency differences between templates and targets than other transformers, indicating their potential for low-data compound design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.