Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37752162›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Non-inferiority of deep learning ischemic stroke segmentation on non-contrast CT within 16-hours compared to expert neuroradiologists.

Sophie Ostmeier, Brian Axelrod, Benjamin F J Verhaaren, Soren Christensen, Abdelkader Mahammedi, Yongkai Liu, Benjamin Pulli, Li-Jia Li, Greg Zaharchuk, Jeremy J Heit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie OstmeierStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Brian AxelrodDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Benjamin F J VerhaarenKU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Soren ChristensenGrayNumber Analytics A/B, Lomma, Sweden.
Abdelkader MahammediStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Yongkai LiuStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Benjamin PulliStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Li-Jia LiStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Greg ZaharchukStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Jeremy J HeitStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA. jheit@stanford.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USKU Leuven · BEStanford University · US

Funding

Predicting Tissue and Functional Outcome in Acute StrokeR01NS130172 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Gregory George Zaharchuk · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS130172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determined if a convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning model can accurately segment acute ischemic changes on non-contrast CT compared to neuroradiologists. Non-contrast CT (NCCT) examinations from 232 acute ischemic stroke patients who were enrolled in the DEFUSE 3 trial were included in this study. Three experienced neuroradiologists independently segmented hypodensity that reflected the ischemic core on each scan. The neuroradiologist with the most experience (expert A) served as the ground truth for deep learning model training. Two additional neuroradiologists' (experts B and C) segmentations were used for data testing. The 232 studies were randomly split into training and test sets. The training set was further randomly divided into 5 folds with training and validation sets. A 3-dimensional CNN architecture was trained and optimized to predict the segmentations of expert A from NCCT. The performance of the model was assessed using a set of volume, overlap, and distance metrics using non-inferiority thresholds of 20%, 3 ml, and 3 mm, respectively. The optimized model trained on expert A was compared to test experts B and C. We used a one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test for the non-inferiority of the model-expert compared to the inter-expert agreement. The final model performance for the ischemic core segmentation task reached a performance of 0.46 ± 0.09 Surface Dice at Tolerance 5mm and 0.47 ± 0.13 Dice when trained on expert A. Compared to the two test neuroradiologists the model-expert agreement was non-inferior to the inter-expert agreement, [Formula: see text]. The before, CNN accurately delineates the hypodense ischemic core on NCCT in acute ischemic stroke patients with an accuracy comparable to neuroradiologists.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiologistsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37752162
PMCPMC10522706
OpenAlexW4387037571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.