Incidental DCIS within a fibroadenoma.

Arnold Chen, Shaveen Kanakaratne, Philip Britten-Jones, Janne Bingham

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports

In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arnold ChenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia a1744906@student.adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9402-2491

Shaveen KanakaratneFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Philip Britten-JonesFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Janne BinghamFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A female in her early 20s was referred to the breast-endocrine surgeons with a self-detected tender left breast lump on the background of a family history of breast cancer. A physical examination revealed a rubbery and mobile mass in the left upper breast. Ultrasound demonstrated a solid hypoechoic mass with a likely differential diagnosis of fibroadenoma, with a subsequent core needle biopsy (CNB) confirming a fibroadenoma. Given the size and tenderness of the lump, an excisional biopsy was performed. Histology revealed a fibroadenoma with components of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ, contained within the fibroadenoma and excised with clear margins.Following surgical excision, a multidisciplinary review determined that no further local therapy was required and recommended a genetics referral. This case was interesting as it raised important questions, including what the best surveillance strategies are for female patients with breast cancer within fibroadenoma and determining the risk and probability of missing epithelial atypia via CNB.

Indexed as

Breast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFibroadenomaBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBreastFemaleHumansBreast cancerBreast surgery

Identifiers

PMID37751969

DOI10.1136/bcr-2023-254609

PMCPMC10533689

OpenAlexW4387063639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.