Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37751875›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2023

A simple model of wake capture aerodynamics.

Mostafa R A Nabawy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Swimming in the Air: The Power of Drag at Miniature Scales.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mostafa R A NabawySchool of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-1635
Cairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flapping wings may encounter or 'capture' the wake from previous half-stroke, leading to local changes in the instantaneous aerodynamic force on the wing at the start of each half-stroke. In this paper, I developed a simple approach to integrating prediction of these wake capture effects into existing analytical quasi-steady models for hovering insect flapping flight. The local wake flow field is modelled as an additional induced velocity component normal to the stroke plane of the flapping motion that is blended/switched in at the start of each half-stroke. Comparison of model results against experimental data in the literature shows satisfactory agreement in predicting the wake capture lift and drag variations for eight different test cases. Sensitivity analysis shows that the form of the translation velocity time history has a significant effect on the magnitude of wake capture forces. Profiles that retain high translational velocity right up to stroke reversal evoke a much larger effect from wake capture compared with sinusoidal. This result is significant because while constant flapping translation velocity profiles can be generated in the laboratory, the very high accelerations required near stroke reversals incur high mechanical cost that prevents practical adoption in nature or engineered flapping flight vehicles.

Indexed as

AccelerationAnimalsMotionWings, Animalaerodynamicsanalytical modellingflapping wingsinsect flightwake capturewing–wake interaction

Identifiers

PMID37751875
PMCPMC10522412
OpenAlexW4387040279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.