Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37751595›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical pharmacology2024

Long-Term Safety Profiles of Macrolides and Tetracyclines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Palapun Waitayangkoon, Soo Jin Moon, Jai Juganya Tirupur Ponnusamy, Li Zeng, Jeffrey Driban, Timothy McAlindon

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial activity of lefamulin against pathogens most commonly causing community-acquired pneumonia: results from the China antimicrobial surveillance network in 2020-2022.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Palapun WaitayangkoonDepartment of Medicine, MetroWest Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Framingham, MA, USA.
Soo Jin MoonDepartment of Medicine, MetroWest Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Framingham, MA, USA.
Jai Juganya Tirupur PonnusamyDepartment of Medicine, MetroWest Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Framingham, MA, USA.
Li ZengDepartment of Immunology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey DribanDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Timothy McAlindonDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Wnt7a-Mediated Competence to Resist Osteoarthritis ProgressionR01AR077146 · NIAMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI ZENG, LI · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Screening antibiotics using NIR fluorescence imaging for osteoarthritis treatmentR21AR069278 · NIAMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI ZENG, LI · 2016 to 2017
$399k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077146NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR069278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrolides and tetracyclines are antibiotics that have a range of anti-inflammatory properties beyond their microbial capabilities. Although these antibiotics have been in widespread use, the long-term safety profiles are limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared macrolides or tetracyclines with placeboes to provide long-term safety information. We searched Medline and EMBASE from inception to October 2022 and identified studies that reported study drug-related death, serious adverse events (SAEs), or withdrawal rates, and common adverse effects of each drug. Relative risk (RR) and number needed to harm were calculated. Of the 52 randomized clinical trials included, there are 3151 participants on doxycycline, 2519 participants on minocycline, 3049 participants on azithromycin, 763 participants on clarithromycin, 262 participants on erythromycin, and 100 participants on roxithromycin. There was no death related to any study drugs and rates of SAE were not significantly different from placebo in any drug. Overall withdrawal rates were slightly higher than placebo in doxycycline (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.52) and minocycline (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15-1.46). Withdrawal rates due to adverse events were higher in doxycycline (RR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.88-4.22), minocycline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09-1.98), and azithromycin (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.08). Gastrointestinal disturbances are the most common tolerable adverse effects for every drug. Photosensitivity and rash are the second most common adverse effects for doxycycline and minocycline. We found no evidence that long-term use up to 2 years of macrolides or tetracyclines was associated with increased risk of SAEs.

Indexed as

AzithromycinMacrolidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineHumansMinocyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinDoxycyclineMacrolidesMinocyclineadverse effectsadverse eventsmacrolidessafetytetracyclines

Identifiers

PMID37751595
PMCPMC11949418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.