SynthesisJournal of clinical pharmacology2024
Long-Term Safety Profiles of Macrolides and Tetracyclines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current practices in antibiotic prophylaxis for patients on complement inhibitors: a multicenter survey across ERN ERKnet centers.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetics of minocycline with and without rifampicin co-administration in patients with nontuberculous mycobacterial disease.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Improving dermatological adverse events from amivantamab plus lazertinib: lessons from the COCOON trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Antibiotic resistance genes in companion animals and humans driven by the gut microbial communities: composition, distribution, and implications.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Atypical Prurigo Pigmentosa Following Ketogenic Diet: Successful Treatment with Doxycycline and Tofacitinib.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Endothelial oncogenic KRAS mutation drives the dynamics of microglia and macrophages in brain arteriovenous malformation.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial activity of lefamulin against pathogens most commonly causing community-acquired pneumonia: results from the China antimicrobial surveillance network in 2020-2022.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Article
- Correlation of lymphocyte-to-monocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios with skin-symptom improvement following antimicrobial treatment in palmoplantar pustulosis.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Article
- Feasibility of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline for elbow tendinopathy.JSES international · 2025Article
- Minocycline in chronic management of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES): a case series and literature review of treatment strategies.Acta epileptologica · 2025Review
- Promises, Pitfalls, and Progress: Doxycycline Prophylaxis for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2025Review
- Effectiveness and safety of tetracyclines and quinolones in people withEClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- What is the role of microbial biotechnology and genetic engineering in medicine?MicrobiologyOpen · 2024Review
- Pharmacogenetic markers and macrolide safety in influenza patients: insights from a prospective study.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
- Symptom relief and cytokine modulation by clarithromycin in mild COVID-19 pneumonia: an exploratory, multicenter, randomized-controlled open-label trial (CAME-COVID study).Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macrolides and tetracyclines are antibiotics that have a range of anti-inflammatory properties beyond their microbial capabilities. Although these antibiotics have been in widespread use, the long-term safety profiles are limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that compared macrolides or tetracyclines with placeboes to provide long-term safety information. We searched Medline and EMBASE from inception to October 2022 and identified studies that reported study drug-related death, serious adverse events (SAEs), or withdrawal rates, and common adverse effects of each drug. Relative risk (RR) and number needed to harm were calculated. Of the 52 randomized clinical trials included, there are 3151 participants on doxycycline, 2519 participants on minocycline, 3049 participants on azithromycin, 763 participants on clarithromycin, 262 participants on erythromycin, and 100 participants on roxithromycin. There was no death related to any study drugs and rates of SAE were not significantly different from placebo in any drug. Overall withdrawal rates were slightly higher than placebo in doxycycline (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.52) and minocycline (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15-1.46). Withdrawal rates due to adverse events were higher in doxycycline (RR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.88-4.22), minocycline (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09-1.98), and azithromycin (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.08). Gastrointestinal disturbances are the most common tolerable adverse effects for every drug. Photosensitivity and rash are the second most common adverse effects for doxycycline and minocycline. We found no evidence that long-term use up to 2 years of macrolides or tetracyclines was associated with increased risk of SAEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.