ArticlePloS one2023
RETRACTED: Synergic effect of polyester fiber and nano silica on chemical resistance of geopolymer mortar.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-04-06Concerns/Issues about Article · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the synergistic effect of polyester fiber-reinforced and nanoslica on the technical performance and durability of geopolymer mortar in terms of the chemical resistance. The study examined how the addition of polyester fiber and nanosilica affects the short-term severe durability of geopolymer mortar specimens made with fly ash (type F). The specimens were cured under ambient conditions. Different percentages (0.6%, 1.2%, and 1.8%) of polyester fiber were used, both with and without nanosilica. Additionally, a reference mixture containing only nanosilica was prepared.All mixtures had a liquid to binder ratio of 0.50, and the ratio of NaOH to Na2SiO3 solution was kept at 2.5:1 by weight. The produced mixes, after 28 days of ambient curing, were immersed for another 28 days in solutions containing 3.5%, 5%, and 5% of sodium chloride, magnesium sulphate and sulfuric acid, respectively. For comparison, control specimens which were not exposed to chemical attacks were tested at the same age of 56 days. Moreover, water absorption and sorptivity tests were conducted to explain the durability performance in a more detailed way. The test results express that the combination of both materials showed a synergistic effect and resulted in greater improvements in compressive and flexural strengths. Both materials can reduce the reduction in compressive strength caused by sulfuric acid exposure, but polyester fiber can increase mass loss. The presence of magnesium sulfate and sodium chloride can lead to a reduction in strength, but the addition of both polyester fiber and nanosilica can mitigate these effects. The addition of fibers creates a network of pores that can limit water absorption, and nanosilica can further enhance the microstructure and reduce water absorption. However, using polyester fiber beyond 1.2 percent can adversely affect the rate of water absorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.