Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37751237›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Advancing Understanding of Just-in-Time States for Supporting Physical Activity (Project JustWalk JITAI): Protocol for a System ID Study of Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions.

Junghwan Park, Meelim Kim, Mohamed El Mistiri, Rachael Kha, Sarasij Banerjee, Lisa Gotzian, Guillaume Chevance, Daniel E Rivera, Predrag Klasnja, Eric Hekler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05273437 (Control Systems Engineering for Counteracting Notification Fatigue), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05273437 nacompletednot on this map

Control Systems Engineering for Counteracting Notification Fatigue: An Examination of Health Behavior Change.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsPhysical Inactivity, Health Behavior, Healthy LifestyleArmsSystem identification experiment for physical activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Twenty years of intervention optimization.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junghwan ParkHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-0457
Meelim KimHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0507-1727
Mohamed El MistiriControl Systems Engineering Laboratory, School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-812X
Rachael KhaInstitute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-7999
Sarasij BanerjeeControl Systems Engineering Laboratory, School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4909-8884
Lisa GotzianLufthansa Industry Solutions, Lufthansa, Norderstedt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0148-7380
Guillaume ChevanceISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8926-4816
Daniel E RiveraControl Systems Engineering Laboratory, School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3141-0577
Predrag KlasnjaSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-703X
Eric HeklerHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-0775

Funding

SCH: Control Systems Engineering for Counteracting Notification Fatigue: An Examination of Health Behavior Change R01LM013107 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HEKLER, ERIC, KLASNJA, PREDRAG · 2019 to 2022
$995k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJust-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are designed to provide support when individuals are receptive and can respond beneficially to the prompt. The notion of a just-in-time (JIT) state is critical for JITAIs. To date, JIT states have been formulated either in a largely data-driven way or based on theory alone. There is a need for an approach that enables rigorous theory testing and optimization of the JIT state concept.

objectiveThe purpose of this system ID experiment was to investigate JIT states empirically and enable the empirical optimization of a JITAI intended to increase physical activity (steps/d).

methodsWe recruited physically inactive English-speaking adults aged ≥25 years who owned smartphones. Participants wore a Fitbit Versa 3 and used the study app for 270 days. The JustWalk JITAI project uses system ID methods to study JIT states. Specifically, provision of support systematically varied across different theoretically plausible operationalizations of JIT states to enable a more rigorous and systematic study of the concept. We experimentally varied 2 intervention components: notifications delivered up to 4 times per day designed to increase a person's steps within the next 3 hours and suggested daily step goals. Notifications to walk were experimentally provided across varied operationalizations of JIT states accounting for need (ie, whether daily step goals were previously met or not), opportunity (ie, whether the next 3 h were a time window during which a person had previously walked), and receptivity (ie, a person previously walked after receiving notifications). Suggested daily step goals varied systematically within a range related to a person's baseline level of steps per day (eg, 4000) until they met clinically meaningful targets (eg, averaging 8000 steps/d as the lower threshold across a cycle). A series of system ID estimation approaches will be used to analyze the data and obtain control-oriented dynamical models to study JIT states. The estimated models from all approaches will be contrasted, with the ultimate goal of guiding rigorous, replicable, empirical formulation and study of JIT states to inform a future JITAI.

resultsAs is common in system ID, we conducted a series of simulation studies to formulate the experiment. The results of our simulation studies illustrated the plausibility of this approach for generating informative and unique data for studying JIT states. The study began enrolling participants in June 2022, with a final enrollment of 48 participants. Data collection concluded in April 2023. Upon completion of the analyses, the results of this study are expected to be submitted for publication in the fourth quarter of 2023.

conclusionsThis study will be the first empirical investigation of JIT states that uses system ID methods to inform the optimization of a scalable JITAI for physical activity.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05273437; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05273437. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52161.

Indexed as

JITJITAIjust-in-timejust-in-time adaptive interventionmobile phoneneedsopportunityphysical activityreceptivitywalking

Identifiers

PMID37751237
PMCPMC10565629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.