Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37751191›Full record

ReviewCancer2024

Characterization of mismatch-repair/microsatellite instability-discordant endometrial cancers.

Courtney J Riedinger, Ashwini Esnakula, Paulina J Haight, Adrian A Suarez, Wei Chen, Jessica Gillespie, Alyssa Villacres, Alexis Chassen, David E Cohn, Paul J Goodfellow and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Courtney J RiedingerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5658-5488
Ashwini EsnakulaDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Paulina J HaightDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Adrian A SuarezDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Wei ChenDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jessica GillespieDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Alyssa VillacresDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Alexis ChassenDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
David E CohnDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Paul J GoodfellowDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0260-4583
Casey M CosgroveDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Combined NGS tumor-based detection of germline Lynch syndrome mutations and prognostic classification of endometrial cancersR01CA223219 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COSGROVE, CASEY, GOODFELLOW, PAUL JOSEPH · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA223219NIH HHS P30CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMismatch-repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status has therapeutic implications in endometrial cancer (EC). The authors evaluated the concordance of testing and factors contributing to MMR expression heterogeneity.

methodsSix hundred sixty-six ECs were characterized using immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI testing, and mut-L homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation. Select samples underwent whole-transcriptome analysis and next-generation sequencing. MMR expression of metastatic/recurrent sites was evaluated.

resultsMSI testing identified 27.3% of cases as MSI-high (n = 182), MMR IHC identified 25.1% cases as MMR-deficient (n = 167), and 3.8% of cases (n = 25) demonstrated discordant results. A review of IHC staining explained discordant results in 18 cases, revealing subclonal loss of MLH1/Pms 1 homolog 2 (PMS2) (n = 10) and heterogeneous MMR IHC (mut-S homolog 6 [MSH6], n = 7; MLH1/PMS2, n = 1). MSH6-associated Lynch syndrome was diagnosed in three of six cases with heterogeneous expression. Subclonal or heterogeneous cases had a 38.9% recurrence rate (compared with 16.7% in complete MMR-deficient cases and 9% in MMR-proficient cases) and had abnormal MMR IHC results in all metastatic recurrent sites (n = 7). Tumors with subclonal MLH1/PMS2 demonstrated 74 differentially expressed genes (determined using digital spatial transcriptomics) when stratified by MLH1 expression, including many associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

conclusionsSubclonal/heterogeneous MMR IHC cases showed epigenetic loss in 66.7%, germline mutations in 16.7%, and somatic mutations in 16.7%. MMR IHC reported as intact/deficient missed 21% of cases of Lynch syndrome. EC with subclonal/heterogeneous MMR expression demonstrated a high recurrence rate, and metastatic/recurrent sites were MMR-deficient. Transcriptional analysis indicated an increased risk for migration/metastasis, suggesting that clonal MMR deficiency may be a driver for tumor aggressiveness. Reporting MMR IHC only as intact/deficient, without reporting subclonal and heterogeneous staining, misses opportunities for biomarker-directed therapy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, and 20%-40% of tumors have a defect in DNA proofreading known as mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiency. These results can be used to guide therapy. Tests for this defect can yield differing results, revealing heterogeneous (mixed) proofreading capabilities. Tumors with discordant testing results and mixed MMR findings can have germline or somatic defects in MMR genes. Cells with deficient DNA proofreading in tumors with mixed MMR findings have DNA expression profiles linked to more aggressive characteristics and cancer spread. These MMR-deficient cells may drive tumor behavior and the risk of spreading cancer.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisEndometrial NeoplasmsNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryDNADNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1DNAMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1biomarkerendometrial cancerLynch syndrome (LS)microsatellite instability (MSI)mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiencytranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID37751191
PMCPMC10843110
OpenAlexW4387032944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.