Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37751082›Full record

ArticleCJEM2023

Cognitive load theory in action: e-learning modules improve performance in simulation-based education. A pilot study.

Gilmar Gutierrez, Isis Olivia Lunsky, Shyan Van Heer, Adam Szulewski, Timothy Chaplin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CJEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gilmar GutierrezDepartment of Psychiatry, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Isis Olivia LunskyFaculty of Health Sciences, Queen's School of Medicine, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Shyan Van HeerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adam SzulewskiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Timothy ChaplinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. chaplintim2@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6037-8230
Queen's University · CAKingston Health Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLearners participating in simulation-based education may experience cognitive overload with potential detrimental effects to learning and performance. Multiple strategies have been proposed to mitigate this detrimental response. However, these strategies have not fully considered the potential benefits of using online platforms, such as accessibility, cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and scalability. Addressing this gap in the literature, preparatory online modules were developed by applying concepts from cognitive load theory and simulation-based education. This study assessed whether using preparatory online modules to deliver weekly pre-briefing content could impact cognitive load and performance. The participants were first-year postgraduate medical trainees participating in a simulation-based resuscitation curriculum.

methodsFifty-three trainees were allocated to receive preparatory online modules (online modules group, n = 27) or not (control group, n = 26) during the course component of a simulation-based resuscitation curriculum. Then, these trainees participated in a simulation-based objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Sources of cognitive load (intrinsic, extraneous, and germane) were measured using a modified cognitive load questionnaire. Performance was assessed using the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and principal component analysis.

resultsDuring the course component, the online modules group was found to have higher intrinsic and germane cognitive load, and lower extraneous cognitive load compared to the control group. During the OSCE, the online modules group scored significantly higher in performance scores (p = 0.0077, d = 0.39, 95% confidence interval = 0.10;0.68) compared to the control group. Principal component analysis supported the results obtained with the modified cognitive load questionnaire.

conclusionTrainees using preparatory online modules during the course component of a simulation-based resuscitation curriculum experienced cognitive load changes consistent with cognitive optimization. This may have contributed to their superior performance in the subsequent OSCE. Future research should explore the long-term impacts of online preparatory training and consider potential barriers to implementation in diverse healthcare environments.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceCognitionCurriculumHumansLearningPilot ProjectsCognitive loadLearningObjective structured clinical examinationOnline modulesSimulation-based education

Identifiers

PMID37751082
OpenAlexW4387032900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.