Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37751076›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Limits of Ultra: Towards an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ultra-Endurance Running Performance.

Nicolas J A Berger, Russ Best, Andrew W Best, Andrew M Lane, Guillaume Y Millet, Martin Barwood, Samuele Marcora, Patrick Wilson, Shawn Bearden

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Nicolas J A BergerSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK. N.Berger@tees.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7276-5246
Russ BestCentre for Sport Science and Human Performance, Wintec, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9017-1513
Andrew W BestDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, North Adams, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1561-2272
Andrew M LaneFaculty of Education Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8296-1248
Guillaume Y MilletUniv Lyon, UJM Saint-Etienne, Inter-University Laboratory of Human Movement Biology, Saint Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6395-0762
Martin BarwoodDepartment of Sport, Health and Nutrition, Leeds Trinity University Horsforth, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-2191
Samuele MarcoraDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1570-7936
Patrick WilsonDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4052-5023
Shawn BeardenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4874-5960
Idaho State University · USLeeds Trinity University · GBMassachusetts College of Liberal Arts · USOld Dominion University · USTeesside University · GBUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Wolverhampton · GBWaikato Institute of Technology · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-endurance running (UER) poses extreme mental and physical challenges that present many barriers to completion, let alone performance. Despite these challenges, participation in UER events continues to increase. With the relative paucity of research into UER training and racing compared with traditional endurance running distance (e.g., marathon), it follows that there are sizable improvements still to be made in UER if the limitations of the sport are sufficiently understood. The purpose of this review is to summarise our current understanding of the major limitations in UER. We begin with an evolutionary perspective that provides the critical background for understanding how our capacities, abilities and limitations have come to be. Although we show that humans display evolutionary adaptations that may bestow an advantage for covering large distances on a daily basis, these often far exceed the levels of our ancestors, which exposes relative limitations. From that framework, we explore the physiological and psychological systems required for running UER events. In each system, the factors that limit performance are highlighted and some guidance for practitioners and future research are shared. Examined systems include thermoregulation, oxygen delivery and utilisation, running economy and biomechanics, fatigue, the digestive system, nutritional and psychological strategies. We show that minimising the cost of running, damage to lower limb tissue and muscle fatigability may become crucial in UER events. Maintaining a sustainable core body temperature is critical to performance, and an even pacing strategy, strategic heat acclimation and individually calculated hydration all contribute to sustained performance. Gastrointestinal issues affect almost every UER participant and can be due to a variety of factors. We present nutritional strategies for different event lengths and types, such as personalised and evidence-based approaches for varying types of carbohydrate, protein and fat intake in fluid or solid form, and how to avoid flavour fatigue. Psychology plays a vital role in UER performance, and we highlight the need to be able to cope with complex situations, and that specific long and short-term goal setting improves performance. Fatigue in UER is multi-factorial, both physical and mental, and the perceived effort or level of fatigue have a major impact on the ability to continue at a given pace. Understanding the complex interplay of these limitations will help prepare UER competitors for the different scenarios they are likely to face. Therefore, this review takes an interdisciplinary approach to synthesising and illuminating limitations in UER performance to assist practitioners and scientists in making informed decisions in practice and applicable research.

Indexed as

Physical EnduranceRunningBody Temperature RegulationFatigueHumansNutritional Status

Identifiers

PMID37751076
OpenAlexW4387033607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.