Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37751063›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2024

Non-monotone Exponential Time (NEXT) Model for the Longitudinal Trend of a Continuous Outcome in Clinical Trials.

Ran Duan, Kaiyi Chen, Yu Du, Pandurang M Kulkarni, Yongming Qu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ran DuanAngitia Biopharmceutical, Inc., Woodland Hills, CA, USA.
Kaiyi ChenDepartment of Global Statistical Sciences, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Yu DuDepartment of Global Statistical Sciences, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Pandurang M KulkarniDepartment of Global Statistical Sciences, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
Yongming QuDepartment of Global Statistical Sciences, Lilly Corporate Center, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA. qu_yongming@lilly.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3643-8066

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dose-response curve has been studied extensively for decades. However, most of these methods ignore intermediate measurements of the response variable and only use the measurement at the endpoint. In early phase trials, it is crucial to utilize all available data due to the smaller sample size. Simulation studies have shown that the longitudinal dose-response surface model provides a more precise parameter estimation compared to the traditional dose response using only data from the primary time point. However, the current longitudinal models with parametric assumptions assume the treatment effect increases monotonically over time, which may be controversial to reality. We propose a parametric non-monotone exponential time (NEXT) model, an enhanced longitudinal dose-response model with greater flexibility, capable of accommodating non-monotonic treatment effects and making predictions for longer-term efficacy. In addition, the estimator for the time to maximum treatment effect and its asymptotic distribution have been derived from NEXT. Extensive simulation studies using known data-generating models and using real clinical data showed the NEXT model outperformed the existing monotone longitudinal models.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationSample SizeIntegrated two-component prediction (ITP) modelMixed mode for repeated measures (MMRM)PredictionTime to the maximum effect

Identifiers

PMID37751063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.