ArticleTropical animal health and production2023
Genomic selection pressure discovery using site-frequency spectrum and reduced local variability statistics in Pakistani Dera-Din-Panah goat.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Genomic Inbreeding and Runs of Homozygosity Analysis of Cashmere Goat.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopulation geneticists have long sought to comprehend various selection traces accumulated in the goat genome due to natural or human driven artificial selection through breeding practices, which led the wild animals to domestication, so understanding evolutionary process may helpful to utilize the full genetic potential of goat genome. METHODS AND
resultsAs a step forward to pinpoint the selection signals in Pakistani Dera-Din-Panah (DDP) goat, whole-genome pooled sequencing (n = 12) was performed, and 618,236,192 clean paired-end reads were mapped against ARS1 reference goat assembly. Five different selection signature statistics were applied using four site-frequency spectrum (SFS) methods (Tajima's D ([Formula: see text]), Fay and Wu's H ([Formula: see text]), Zeng's E ([Formula: see text]), [Formula: see text]) and one reduced local variability approach named pooled heterozygosity ([Formula: see text]). The under-selection regions were annotated with significant threshold values of [Formula: see text]≥4.7, [Formula: see text]≥6, [Formula: see text]≥2.5, Pool-HMM ≥ 12, and [Formula: see text]≥5 that resulted in accumulative 364 candidate gene hits. The highest genomic selection signals were observed on Chr. 4, 6, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 27 and harbor ADAMTS6, CWC27, RELN, MYCBP2, FGF14, STIM1, CFAP74, GNB1, CALML6, TMEM52, FAM149A, NADK, MMP23B, OPN3, FH, MFHAS1, KLKB1, RRM1, KMO, SPEF2, F11, KIT, KMO, ERI1, ATP8B4, and RHOG genes. Next, the validation of our captured genomic hits was also performed by more than one applied statistics which harbor meat production, immunity, and reproduction associated genes to strengthen our hypothesis of under-selection traits in this Pakistani goat breed. Furthermore, common candidate genes captured by more than one statistical method were subjected to gene ontology and KEGG pathway analysis to get insights of particular biological processes associated with this goat breed.
conclusionCurrent perception of genomic architecture of DDP goat provides a better understanding to improve its genetic potential and other economically important traits of medium to large body size, milk, and fiber production by updating the genomic insight driven breeding strategies to boost the livestock and agriculture-based economy of the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.